Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30414610›Full record

Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2018

Periprosthetic infection is the major indication for TKA revision - experiences from a university referral arthroplasty center.

S P Boelch, A Jakuscheit, S Doerries, L Fraissler, M Hoberg, J Arnholdt, M Rudert

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predictors of outcome following two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Viruses · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the knee society score following revision total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Current treatments for biofilm-associated periprosthetic joint infection and new potential strategies.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S P BoelchDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Julius-Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, 11 Brettreichstrasse, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany.
A JakuscheitDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Julius-Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, 11 Brettreichstrasse, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany.
S DoerriesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Julius-Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, 11 Brettreichstrasse, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany.
L FraisslerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Julius-Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, 11 Brettreichstrasse, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany.
M HobergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Julius-Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, 11 Brettreichstrasse, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany.
J ArnholdtDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Julius-Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, 11 Brettreichstrasse, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany. j-arnholdt.klh@uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4930-2611
M RudertDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Julius-Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, 11 Brettreichstrasse, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe hypothesized, that periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) accounts for the major proportion of first (primary) and repeated (secondary) Total Knee Arthroplasty revisions at our university referral arthroplasty center.

methodsOne thousand one hundred forty-three revisions, performed between 2008 and 2016 were grouped into primary (55%) and secondary (45%) revisions. The rate of revision indications was calculated and indications were categorized by time after index operation. The odds ratios of the indications for primary versus secondary revision were calculated.

resultsIn the primary revision group PJI accounted for 22.3%, instability for 20.0%, aseptic loosening for 14.9% and retropatellar arthrosis for 14.2%. PJI (25.6%) was the most common indication up to 1 year after implantation, retropatellar arthrosis (26.8%) 1-3 years and aseptic loosening (25.6%) more than 3 years after implantation. In the secondary revision group PJI accounted for 39.7%, aseptic loosening for 16.2% and instability for 13.2%. PJI was the most common indication at any time of revision with 43.8% up to one, 35.4% 1-3 years and 39.4% more the 3 years after index operation. The odds ratios in repeated revision were 2.32 times higher (p = 0.000) for PJI. For instability and retropatellar arthrosis the odds ratios were 0.60 times (p = 0.006) and 0.22 times (p = 0.000) lower.

conclusionsPJI is the most common indication for secondary TKA revision and within one year after primary TKA. Aseptical failures such as instability, retropatellar arthrosis and aseptical loosening are the predominant reasons for revision more than one year after primary TKA.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis-Related InfectionsReferral and ConsultationReoperationRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultFailureKnee arthroplastyPeriprosthetic infectionRevision

Identifiers

PMID30414610
PMCPMC6234791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.