Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30414607›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2018

Prediction of hemodynamic fluctuations after induction of general anesthesia using propofol in non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Sho Kawasaki, Chikako Kiyohara, Shoji Tokunaga, Sumio Hoka

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Anesthetic Agents Isoflurane and Propofol Decrease Maximal CaThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sho KawasakiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.
Chikako KiyoharaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan. chikako@phealth.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-8825-9281
Shoji TokunagaMedical Information Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.
Sumio HokaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kyushu University · JPKyushu University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough propofol is a common anesthetic agent for the induction of general anesthesia, hemodynamic fluctuations are occasionally prominent during induction/intubation. The aims of this study were to determine the influential factors on enhanced hemodynamic fluctuation and to establish a prediction formula to quickly determine the dose of propofol to protect against hemodynamic fluctuations.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study patients (n = 2097) were 18 years or older. They underwent general anesthesia induction using propofol and orotracheal intubation for non-cardiac surgery at Kyushu University Hospital during April 2015 to March 2016. Preoperative patient clinical information was collected from anesthesia preoperative evaluation records. Intraoperative data were obtained from computerized anesthesia records. If patients' post-induction mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) decreased or increased 30% or more from their pre-induction MAP, they were determined to have enhanced hemodynamic fluctuations. Unconditional logistic regression was used to assess the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to simultaneously examine the direct and indirect effect (path coefficient = r) of potential variables.

resultsIn the SEM analysis, age was significantly associated with enhanced hemodynamic fluctuations (adjusted odds ratio = 1.008, 95% CI = 1.001-1.015, P = 0.03). Age (path coefficient (r) = - 0.0113, 95% CI = - 0.0126-0.010, P < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) (r = - 0.0788, 95% CI = - 0.1431-0.0145, P = 0.02), sex (r = 0.057, 95% CI = 0.0149-0.9906, P = 0.01), and fentanyl dose (r = 0.1087, 95% CI = 0.0707-0.1467, P < 0.001) influenced the dose of propofol in induction. The prediction formula of "Propofol dose (mg) = [2.374 - 0.0113 × age (year) - 0.0788 (if ASA-PS 3 or 4) + 0.057 (if female) + 0.1087 × fentanyl dose (μg/kg)] × body weight (kg)" was derived.

conclusionsAge was associated with hemodynamic fluctuations in induction. Although the prediction formula is considered to be acceptable, future studies validating whether it can decrease patients' risk of enhanced hemodynamic fluctuations in clinical situations are necessary.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, IntravenousCohort StudiesFemaleHemodynamicsHumansIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPropofolAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofolAnesthesia inductionHemodynamicsPrediction formulaPropofol

Identifiers

PMID30414607
PMCPMC6234779
OpenAlexW2900400094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.