Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30414484›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2019

Freeze-casting porous chitosan ureteral stents for improved drainage.

Kaiyang Yin, Prajan Divakar, Ulrike G K Wegst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. An architecturally rational hemostat for rapid stopping of massive bleeding on anticoagulation therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Hierarchical structure formation by crystal growth-front instabilities during ice templating.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Computational simulation of the flow dynamic field in a porous ureteric stent.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Latest advancements in ureteral stent technology.Translational andrology and urology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Electroactive Smart Polymers for Biomedical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaiyang YinThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, 14 Engineering Dr, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Prajan DivakarThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, 14 Engineering Dr, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Ulrike G K WegstThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, 14 Engineering Dr, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Electronic address: ulrike.wegst@dartmouth.edu.
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

A Nanotherapeutic Device for Effective Non-Surgical Female SterilizationR21HD087828 · NICHD · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI WEGST, ULRIKE GESA KATHARINA · 2016 to 2017
$435k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD087828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a new strategy for improved urinary drainage, in parallel to the potential for additional functions such as drug release and self-removal, highly porous chitosan stents are manufactured by radial, bi-directional freeze-casting. Inserting the porous stent in to a silicone tube to emulate its placement in the ureter shows that it is shape conforming and remains safely positioned in place, also during flow tests, including those performed in a peristaltic pump. Cyclic compression tests on fully-hydrated porous stents reveal high stent resilience and close to full elastic recovery upon unloading. The drainage performance of the chitosan stent is evaluated, using effective viscosity in addition to volumetric flow and flux; the porous stent's performance is compared to that of the straight portion of a commercial 8 Fr double-J stent which possesses, in its otherwise solid tube wall, regularly spaced holes along its length. Both the porous and the 8 Fr stent show higher effective viscosities, when tested in the silicone tube. The performance of the porous stent improves considerably more (47.5%) than that of the 8 Fr stent (30.6%) upon removal from the tube, illustrating the effectiveness of the radially aligned porosity for drainage. We conclude that the newly-developed porous chitosan ureteral stent merits further in vitro and in vivo assessment of its promise as an alternative and complement to currently available medical devices. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: No papers, to date, report on porous ureteral stents, which we propose as a new strategy for improved urinary drainage. The highly porous chitosan stents of our study are manufactured by radial, bi-directional freeze casting. Cyclic compression tests on fully-hydrated porous stents revealed high stent resilience and close to full recovery upon unloading. The drainage performance of the chitosan is evaluated, using effective viscosity in addition to volumetric flow and flux, and compared to that of the straight portion of a commercial 8 Fr double-J stent. The performance of the porous stent improves considerably more (47.5%) than that of the 8 Fr stent (30.6%) upon removal from the tube, illustrating the effectiveness of the radially aligned porosity for drainage. While further studies are required to explore other potential benefits of the porous stent design such as antimicrobial behavior, drug release, and biodegradability, we conclude that the newly-developed porous chitosan ureteral stent has considerable potential as a medical device.

Indexed as

StentsUreterChitosanHumansPorosityChitosanBi-directional freezingCyclic loadingFlowFluxRadial structure

Identifiers

PMID30414484
PMCPMC6864386
OpenAlexW2900300727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.