Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30414353›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2019

Screening of Hyperlipidemia Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States.

Iris Navarro-Millán, Shuo Yang, Lang Chen, Huifeng Yun, Aprajita Jagpal, Christie M Bartels, Liana Fraenkel, Monika M Safford, Jeffrey R Curtis

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Iris Navarro-MillánWeill Cornell Medicine and the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9540-6614
Shuo YangUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Lang ChenUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Huifeng YunUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Aprajita JagpalUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Christie M BartelsUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison.ORCID 0000-0001-6523-0374
Liana FraenkelYale University, New Haven, CT.
Monika M SaffordWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Jeffrey R CurtisUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-8976
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USCornell University · USHospital for Special Surgery · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke-Myocardial Infarction-4 (REGARDS-MI-4)R01HL165452 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LEVITAN, EMILY B, SAFFORD, MONIKA M · 2022 to 2025
$8.3M
Improving Decision Making in Patients with Rheumatic DiseaseK24AR060231 · NIAMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRAENKEL, LIANA · 2011 to 2018
$1.2M
Optimization of hyperlipidemia management among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A patient-centered intervention developmentK23AR068449 · NIAMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI NAVARRO-MILLÁN, IRIS Y · 2017 to 2022
$1.0M
Building Capacity for Cardiometabolic Outcomes ResearchK24HL111154 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SAFFORD, MONIKA M · 2012 to 2015
$556k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL111154NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL165452NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR068449NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR060231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the proportion of primary lipid screening among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and compare it with those among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and patients with neither RA nor DM, and to assess whether primary lipid screening varied according to the health care provider (rheumatologist versus non-rheumatologist).

methodsWe analyzed claims data from US private and public health plans from 2006-2010. Eligibility requirements included continuous medical and pharmacy coverage for ≥12 months (baseline period) and >2 physician diagnoses and relevant medications to define RA, DM, RA and DM, or neither condition. Among the 330,695 eligible participants, we calculated the proportion with a lipid profile ordered during the 2 years following baseline. Time-varying Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the probability of hyperlipidemia screening in participants with RA according to provider specialty.

resultsMore than half of the patients were ages 41-71 years. Among patients with RA (n = 12,182), DM (n = 62,834), RA and DM (n = 1,082), and those who did not have either condition (n = 167,811), the proportion screened for hyperlipidemia was 37%, 60%, 55%, and 41%, respectively. Patients with RA who visited a rheumatologist and a non-rheumatology clinician during follow-up had a 55% (95% confidence interval 1.36-1.78) higher screening probability than those who only visited a rheumatologist.

conclusionPrimary lipid screening was suboptimal among patients with RA. It was also lower for patients with DM and minimally different from the general population. Screening was higher for RA patients who received care from both a rheumatologist and a non-rheumatologist (e.g., primary care physician).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthritis, RheumatoidBiomarkersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHyperlipidemiasIncidenceLipidsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesBiomarkersLipids

Identifiers

PMID30414353
PMCPMC6510643
OpenAlexW2899829423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.