Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30414100›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Incidence of initial spinal metastasis in glioblastoma patients and the importance of spinal screening using MRI.

Ichiyo Shibahara, Ryuta Saito, Yoshinari Osada, Masayuki Kanamori, Yukihiko Sonoda, Toshihiro Kumabe, Shunji Mugikura, Mika Watanabe, Teiji Tominaga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An Unusual Presentation of Spinal Giant Cell Glioblastoma in a 21-Year-Old Female.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reports
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ichiyo ShibaharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Ryuta SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan. ryuta@nsg.med.tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2484-1360
Yoshinari OsadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Masayuki KanamoriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Yukihiko SonodaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Toshihiro KumabeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Shunji MugikuraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Mika WatanabeDepartment of Pathology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Teiji TominagaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Tohoku University · JPKitasato University · JPTohoku University Hospital · JPYamagata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntracranial glioblastomas with simultaneous spinal lesions prior to chemoradiation therapy or craniotomy, defined as initial spinal metastasis, are not well understood. Herein, we investigated intracranial glioblastoma and demonstrated the importance of spinal screening using gadolinium enhanced spinal magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-MRI).

methodsConsecutive adult patients with intracranial glioblastoma were treated between 2010 and 2014 and received spinal screening using Gd-MRI. Spinal screening was performed regardless of spine-related symptoms, and patients presenting with and without initial spinal metastasis (spinal and non-spinal groups, respectively) were compared based on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, radiological and molecular features, and overall survival (OS).

resultsDuring the study period, 116 glioblastoma cases were treated and 87 of these (76%) underwent spinal screening. Among these patients, 11 (13%) were included in the spinal group, and 76 (87%) were included in the non-spinal group. All patients of the spinal group were free of symptoms related to spinal lesions. Compared with the non-spinal group, intracranial lesions of the spinal group presented higher incidences of intracranial dissemination and were located at subventricular zones (P = 0.0012 and 0.020, respectively). MIB-1 labeling index, molecular alterations such as IDH1 mutation, TERT promoter mutation, and immunoreactivity of ATRX and MGMT did not differ between two groups. OS was significantly shorter in the spinal group than in the non-spinal group (P = 0.0054).

conclusionsThis study revealed a relatively high incidence of spinal metastasis. A subset of glioblastoma patients benefited from spinal screening, through which early detection of asymptomatic spinal metastasis was achieved.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGlioblastomaHumansIncidenceIsocitrate DehydrogenaseKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMutationATRX protein, humanDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTelomeraseTERT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsX-linked Nuclear ProteinGlioblastomaMRISpinal metastasisSubventricular zone

Identifiers

PMID30414100
OpenAlexW2900156334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.