Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413993›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2019

Assessment of a novel radiation reduction protocol for pediatric and adult congenital device implantation.

Bradley C Clark, Christopher M Janson, Scott R Ceresnak, Frank A Osei, William J Bonney, Lynn Nappo, Robert H Pass

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bradley C ClarkChildren's Hospital at Montefiore, 3415 Bainbridge Ave, Rosenthal 1 Pediatrics, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA. bradleyclarkep@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8186-8471
Christopher M JansonChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Scott R CeresnakLucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Frank A OseiUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Tupelo, MS, USA.
William J BonneyChildren's Hospital at Montefiore, 3415 Bainbridge Ave, Rosenthal 1 Pediatrics, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.
Lynn NappoChildren's Hospital at Montefiore, 3415 Bainbridge Ave, Rosenthal 1 Pediatrics, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.
Robert H PassChildren's Hospital at Montefiore, 3415 Bainbridge Ave, Rosenthal 1 Pediatrics, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDevice implantation requires fluoroscopic guidance, which carries inherent risks of ionizing radiation. We evaluated the impact of a low-dose fluoroscopic protocol on radiation exposure during device implantation.

methodsAll patients who underwent pacemaker or ICD implantation with new transvenous leads from July 2011 to January 2018 were included. A novel ALARA protocol consisting of ultra-low frame rates (2-3 frames/s), low dose/frame (6-18 mGy/frame), and use of the "air-gap" technique in patients < 20 kg was employed. Demographics, procedural data, and radiation exposure levels were collected and analyzed.

resultsThirty patients underwent device implantation without additional catheterization, electrophysiology study, or ablation procedure (median age 15 years; range 5-50) with a total of 43 leads placed. Forty-seven percent of patients had a primary rhythm disturbance, 33% had cardiomyopathy, and 20% had congenital heart disease. Fifty percent were pacemakers (53% dual-chamber, 27% ventricle, 20% atrial) and 50% of devices implanted were ICDs (87% single-chamber). All implants were acutely successful with acceptable atrial and ventricular sensing and capture thresholds. The median fluoroscopy time was 11.5 min (inter-quartile range (IQR) 8.0-18.2), median air kerma dose 4.0 mGy (IQR 2.5-19.5), and median dose-area product 27.8 μGy/m

conclusionsUse of a novel fluoroscopic protocol may help decrease radiation exposure to patients and staff without affecting efficacy or risk. These data may represent benchmarks against which future device implantation procedures can be compared.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFluoroscopyHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureRadiation ExposureRadiation ProtectionTime FactorsAdult congenitalFluoroscopyImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorPacemakerPediatricRadiation reduction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.