Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413975›Full record

ReviewReviews of environmental contamination and toxicology2019

Graphene-Based Nanomaterials Toxicity in Fish.

Asok K Dasmahapatra, Thabitha P S Dasari, Paul B Tchounwou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Polydopamine-Wool Textiles for Sustainable Interfacial Solar Vapor Generation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Toxicologic Concerns with Current Medical Nanoparticles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Graphene Oxide Thin Films with Drug Delivery Function.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asok K DasmahapatraResearch Centers in Minority Institutions, Center for Environmental Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA.
Thabitha P S DasariResearch Centers in Minority Institutions, Center for Environmental Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA.
Paul B TchounwouResearch Centers in Minority Institutions, Center for Environmental Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA. paul.b.tchounwou@jsums.edu.

Funding

STEERING COMMITTEEU54MD008149 · NIMHD · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI OFILI, ELIZABETH O. · 2012 to 2018
$21.1M
RCMI-Center for Environmental HealthG12MD007581 · NIMHD · JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TCHOUNWOU, PAUL B. · 2012 to 2017
$11.2M
NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007581NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD008149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their unique physicochemical properties, graphene-based nanoparticles (GPNs) constitute one of the most promising types of nanomaterials used in biomedical research. GPNs have been used as polymeric conduits for nerve regeneration and carriers for targeted drug delivery and in the treatment of cancer via photothermal therapy. Moreover, they have been used as tracers to study the distribution of bioactive compounds used in healthcare. Due to their extensive use, GPN released into the environment would probably pose a threat to living organisms and ultimately to human health. Their accumulation in the aquatic environment creates problems to aquatic habitats as well as to food chains. Until now the potential toxic effects of GPN are not properly understood. Despite agglomeration and long persistence in the environment, GPNs are able to cross the cellular barriers successfully, entered into the cells, and are able to interact with almost all the cellular sites including the plasma membrane, cytoplasmic organelles, and nucleus. Their interaction with DNA creates more potential threats to both the genome and epigenome. In this brief review, we focused on fish, mainly zebrafish (Danio rerio), as a potential target animal of GPN toxicity in the aquatic ecosystem.

Indexed as

AnimalsGraphiteHumansNanoparticlesNanostructuresWater Pollutants, ChemicalZebrafishGraphiteWater Pollutants, ChemicalAgglomerationApoptosisAquatic environmentBioaccumulationBiomedical researchCommon carpEpigenomeFew-layer grapheneGenomeGraphene-based nanoparticlesGraphene nanosheetsGraphene oxideGraphene quantum dotsGraphene ribbonsJapanese medaka fishNeurodegenerative disordersOxidative stressParkinson’s diseaseReduced graphene oxideReduced graphene quantum dotsSingle-layer grapheneSleeping disorderToxicityZebrafishZebrafish embryosZebrafish larvae

Identifiers

PMID30413975
PMCPMC6481941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.