ReviewCurrent urology reports2018
Molecular Imaging for Evaluation of Viable Testicular Cancer Nodal Metastases.
Review in Current urology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel PET tracers to distinguish the nature of residual masses after the completion of chemotherapy in metastatic testicular germ cell tumours: A systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Nuclear medicine imaging in non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: lessons learned from the past failures.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Review
- Lymph Node Dissection in Testicular Cancer: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Development and validation of a nomogram to predict lung metastasis in patients with testicular germ cell tumors.Heliyon · 2023Article
- CT Rendering and Radiomic Analysis in Post-Chemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer to Anticipate Difficulties for Young Surgeons.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Defining risk of micrometastatic disease and tumor recurrence in patients with stage I testicular germ cell tumors.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewDetermining the metastatic viability of suspicious retroperitoneal nodes in testicular cancer with conventional imaging is challenging. The aim of this report is to review recent evidence in the utilization of novel imaging modalities to assess viable testicular cancer nodal metastases. RECENT EVIDENCE: Testicular germ cell tumors (TCGTs) follow a predictable lymphatic metastatic spread to the retroperitoneum. Accordingly, retroperitoneal imaging is critical in staging, assessing treatment response, and evaluating for recurrence. Conventional computed tomography (CT) imaging is effective in diagnosing pathologically enlarged lymph nodes but lacks the molecular information to determine if suspicious nodes harbor viable tumor. Positron emission tomography (PET) with the metabolic radiotracer 2-deoxy-2-[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.