Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413959›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Preoperative radiomic signature based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for noninvasive evaluation of biological characteristics in rectal cancer.

Xiaochun Meng, Wei Xia, Peiyi Xie, Rui Zhang, Wenru Li, Mengmeng Wang, Fei Xiong, Yangchuan Liu, Xinjuan Fan, Yao Xie and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Radiomics to predict PNI in ESCC.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xiaochun MengDepartment of Radiology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
Wei XiaSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 88 Keling Road, Suzhou New District, Suzhou, 215163, Jiangsu, China.
Peiyi XieDepartment of Radiology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
Rui ZhangSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 88 Keling Road, Suzhou New District, Suzhou, 215163, Jiangsu, China.
Wenru LiDepartment of Radiology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
Mengmeng WangSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 88 Keling Road, Suzhou New District, Suzhou, 215163, Jiangsu, China.
Fei XiongDepartment of Radiology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
Yangchuan LiuSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 88 Keling Road, Suzhou New District, Suzhou, 215163, Jiangsu, China.
Xinjuan FanDepartment of Pathology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
Yao XieDepartment of Radiology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
Xiangbo WanDepartment of Radiotherapy, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
Kangshun ZhuDepartment of Interventional Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, China.
Hong ShanGuangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 519000, Guangdong, China. wangl9@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Xin GaoSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 88 Keling Road, Suzhou New District, Suzhou, 215163, Jiangsu, China. xingaosam@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9906-0596

Funding

Foundation for Pearl River Science & Technology Young Scholars of Guangzhou 201610010059National Natural Science Foundation of China 81430041National Natural Science Foundation of China 81571772Science, Technology Plan Projects of Jiangsu-Society Development Project BE2017671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate radiomic models in evaluating biological characteristics of rectal cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI).

methodsThis study consisted of 345 patients with rectal cancer who underwent MP-MRI. We focused on evaluating five postoperative confirmed characteristics: lymph node (LN) metastasis, tumor differentiation, fraction of Ki-67-positive tumor cells, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), and KRAS-2 gene mutation status. Data from 197 patients were used to develop the biological characteristics evaluation models. Radiomic features were extracted from MP-MRI and then refined for reproducibility and redundancy. The refined features were investigated for usefulness in building radiomic signatures by using two feature-ranking methods (MRMR and WLCX) and three classifiers (RF, SVM, and LASSO). Multivariable logistic regression was used to build an integrated evaluation model combining radiomic signatures and clinical characteristics. The performance was evaluated using an independent validation dataset comprising 148 patients.

resultsThe MRMR and LASSO regression produced the best-performing radiomic signatures for evaluating HER-2, LN metastasis, tumor differentiation, and KRAS-2 gene status, with AUC values of 0.696 (95% CI, 0.610-0.782), 0.677 (95% CI, 0.591-0.763), 0.720 (95% CI, 0.621-0.819), and 0.651 (95% CI, 0.539-0.763), respectively. The best-performing signatures for evaluating Ki-67 produced an AUC value of 0.699 (95% CI, 0.611-0.786), and it was developed by WLCX and RF algorithm. The integrated evaluation model incorporating radiomic signature and MRI-reported LN status had improved AUC of 0.697 (95% CI, 0.612-0.781).

conclusionRadiomic signatures based on MP-MRI have potential to noninvasively evaluate the biological characteristics of rectal cancer. KEY POINTS: • Radiomic features were extracted from MP-MRI images of the rectal tumor. • The proposed radiomic signatures demonstrated discrimination ability in identifying the histopathological, immunohistochemical, and genetic characteristics of rectal cancer. • All MRI sequences were important and could provide complementary information in radiomic analysis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsColectomyBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative PeriodRectal NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, TumorAlgorithmsMagnetic resonance imagingRectal neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.