Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413930›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2019

Endothelial Progenitor Cells Biology in Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Arterial Disease and their Therapeutic Potential.

Anna Pyšná, Robert Bém, Andrea Němcová, Vladimíra Fejfarová, Alexandra Jirkovská, Jitka Hazdrová, Edward B Jude, Michal Dubský

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative study on the efficacy of PRP gel and UC-MSCs gel as adjuvant therapies in the treatment of DFU wounds.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna PyšnáInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Robert BémInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Andrea NěmcováInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vladimíra FejfarováInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Alexandra JirkovskáInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jitka HazdrováInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Edward B JudeDiabetes Centre, Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Lancashire, UK.
Michal DubskýInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. michal.dubsky@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2078-0177
Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZTameside Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endothelial progenitors are a population of cells with the inherent capacity to differentiate into mature endothelial cells and proangiogenic paracrine action. These characteristics have led to extensive studies being performed and tested in the treatment of tissue ischemia. The natural course of diabetes mellitus (DM) results in multiple areas of vascular damage. Thus endothelial progenitor cells'(EPCs) beneficial potential is particularly desirable in diabetic patients. In this review, we summarize contemporary knowledge of EPC biology in DM. It has been shown that EPC functions are considerably impaired by DM. The presence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) seems to further exacerbate the deficiencies of EPCs. However, studies examining EPC counts in PAD and DM observed disparate results, which can be due to a lack of consensus on precise EPC immunotype used in the different studies. Nevertheless, the results of EPC-based autologous cell therapy (ACT) are promising. In addition, EPCs have been shown to bean independent predictor of cardiovascular risk and diabetic foot ulcer healing.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCells, CulturedDiabetes MellitusEndothelial Progenitor CellsHumansPeripheral Arterial DiseaseAutologous cell therapyDiabetes mellitusEndothelial progenitor cellsPeripheral arterial diseaseVascular repair

Identifiers

PMID30413930
OpenAlexW2900059621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.