Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413828›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2019

The clinical role of the TME in solid cancer.

Nicolas A Giraldo, Rafael Sanchez-Salas, J David Peske, Yann Vano, Etienne Becht, Florent Petitprez, Pierre Validire, Alexandre Ingels, Xavier Cathelineau, Wolf Herman Fridman and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 468 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
468citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

468 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Exercise therapy in cancer prevention and treatment.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Dual-time-point [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

408 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicolas A GiraldoPathology Department, The Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. ngirald1@jhmi.edu.
Rafael Sanchez-SalasUrology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, F-75014, Paris, France.
J David PeskePathology Department, The Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yann VanoOncology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Etienne BechtSingapore Immunology Network (SIgN), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Florent PetitprezINSERM, UMR_S 1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Team "Cancer, immune control and escape", F-75006, Paris, France.
Pierre ValidirePathology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, F-75014, Paris, France.
Alexandre IngelsUrology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, F-75014, Paris, France.
Xavier CathelineauUrology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, F-75014, Paris, France.
Wolf Herman FridmanINSERM, UMR_S 1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Team "Cancer, immune control and escape", F-75006, Paris, France.
Catherine Sautès-FridmanINSERM, UMR_S 1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Team "Cancer, immune control and escape", F-75006, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The highly complex and heterogenous ecosystem of a tumour not only contains malignant cells, but also interacting cells from the host such as endothelial cells, stromal fibroblasts, and a variety of immune cells that control tumour growth and invasion. It is well established that anti-tumour immunity is a critical hurdle that must be overcome for tumours to initiate, grow and spread and that anti-tumour immunity can be modulated using current immunotherapies to achieve meaningful anti-tumour clinical responses. Pioneering studies in melanoma, ovarian and colorectal cancer have demonstrated that certain features of the tumour immune microenvironment (TME)-in particular, the degree of tumour infiltration by cytotoxic T cells-can predict a patient's clinical outcome. More recently, studies in renal cell cancer have highlighted the importance of assessing the phenotype of the infiltrating T cells to predict early relapse. Furthermore, intricate interactions with non-immune cellular players such as endothelial cells and fibroblasts modulate the clinical impact of immune cells in the TME. Here, we review the critical components of the TME in solid tumours and how they shape the immune cell contexture, and we summarise numerous studies evaluating its clinical significance from a prognostic and theranostic perspective.

Indexed as

Cancer-Associated FibroblastsCell ProliferationEndothelial CellsHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasmsT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID30413828
PMCPMC6325164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.