Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413805›Full record

ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2019

Circulating tumor DNA in advanced prostate cancer: transitioning from discovery to a clinically implemented test.

Enrique González-Billalabeitia, Vincenza Conteduca, Daniel Wetterskog, Anuradha Jayaram, Gerhardt Attard

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Glutathione-S-TransferaseInternational journal of endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Recommendations for the implementation of genetic testing for metastatic prostate cancer patients in Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Enrique González-BillalabeitiaServicio de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, IMIB-Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, 30008, Spain. enrique.gonzalezbilla@gmail.com.
Vincenza ConteducaIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), IRCCS, Meldola, 47014, Italy.
Daniel WetterskogResearch Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.
Anuradha JayaramResearch Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.
Gerhardt AttardResearch Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. g.attard@ucl.ac.uk.
London Cancer · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22744Medical Research Council MR/P002072/2Prostate Cancer UK PG12-49
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) differs from that of the primary tumor and is dynamic during tumor progression. The real-time and repeated characterization of this process via conventional solid tumor biopsies is challenging. Alternatively, circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) containing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be obtained from patient plasma using minimally disruptive blood draws and is amenable to sequential analysis. ctDNA has high overlap with the genomic sequences of biopsies from metastases and has the advantage of being representative of multiple metastases. The availability of techniques with high sensitivity and specificity, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital PCR, has greatly contributed to the development of the cfDNA field and enabled the detection of genomic alterations at low ctDNA fractions. In mCRPC, a number of clinically relevant genomic alterations have been tracked in ctDNA, including androgen receptor (AR) aberrations, which have been shown to be associated with an adverse outcome to novel antiandrogen therapies, and alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, which have been associated with a response to PARP inhibitors. Several clinical applications have been proposed for cfDNA analysis, including its use as a prognostic tool, as a predictive biomarker, to monitor tumor response and to identify novel mechanisms of resistance. To date, the cfDNA analysis has provided interesting results, but there is an urgent need for these findings to be confirmed in prospective clinical trials.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADNA, NeoplasmBiomarkersHomologous RecombinationHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingProstatic NeoplasmsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID30413805
PMCPMC6398580
OpenAlexW2900258981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.