Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413745›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Experimental screening studies on rabies virus transmission and oral rabies vaccination of the Greater Kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros).

Rainer Hassel, Ad Vos, Peter Clausen, Susan Moore, Jolandie van der Westhuizen, Siegfried Khaiseb, Juliet Kabajani, Florian Pfaff, Dirk Höper, Boris Hundt and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rainer HasselSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Namibia, Private Bag 13301, Windhoek, Namibia.
Ad VosIDT Biologika GmbH, Am Pharmapark, 06861, Dessau-Rosslau, Germany.
Peter ClausenOkosongoro Safari Ranch, P.O. Box 324, Omaruru, Namibia.
Susan MooreKansas State University, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Rabies Laboratory, Manhattan, KS, 66502, USA.
Jolandie van der WesthuizenCentral Veterinary Laboratory, Private Bag 13187, Windhoek, Namibia.
Siegfried KhaisebCentral Veterinary Laboratory, Private Bag 13187, Windhoek, Namibia.
Juliet KabajaniCentral Veterinary Laboratory, Private Bag 13187, Windhoek, Namibia.
Florian PfaffInstitute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0178-6183
Dirk HöperInstitute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8408-2274
Boris HundtIDT Biologika GmbH, Am Pharmapark, 06861, Dessau-Rosslau, Germany.
Mark JagoSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Namibia, Private Bag 13301, Windhoek, Namibia.
Floris BruwerProVision at Agra Ltd., Private Bag 12011, Windhoek, Namibia.
Pauline LindequeProVision at Agra Ltd., Private Bag 12011, Windhoek, Namibia.
Stefan FinkeInstitute of Molecular Virology and Cell Biology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany.
Conrad M FreulingInstitute of Molecular Virology and Cell Biology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany.
Thomas MüllerInstitute of Molecular Virology and Cell Biology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany. thomas.mueller@fli.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0959-3653
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEIDT Biologika (Germany) · DEUniversity of Namibia · NAKansas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies in the Greater Kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros) in Namibia is unique and found in such magnitude as has not been reported elsewhere in southern Africa. Reasons as to why Kudus appear to be exceptionally susceptible to rabies still remain speculative at best. Because the current severe rabies endemic in Kudus continues to have an enormous negative impact on the Namibian agricultural sector, we set out to question existing dogmas regarding the epidemiology of the disease in a unique experimental setting. In addition, we explored effective measures to protect these antelopes. Although we were able to confirm high susceptibly of kudus for rabies and sporadic horizontal rabies virus transmission to contact animals, we contend that these observations cannot plausibly explain the rapid spread of the disease in Kudus over large territories. Since parenteral vaccination of free-roaming Kudus is virtually impossible, oral rabies vaccination using modified life virus vaccines with a high safety profile would be the ultimate solution to the problem. In a proof-of-concept study using a 3rd generation oral rabies virus vaccine construct (SPBN GASGAS) we found evidence that Kudus can be vaccinated by the oral route and protected against a subsequent rabies infection. In a second phase, more targeted studies need to be initiated by focusing on optimizing oral vaccine uptake and delivery.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntelopesFemaleHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysImmunizationMaleRabiesRabies VaccinesRabies virusRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30413745
PMCPMC6226427
OpenAlexW2900203173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.