Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413507›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Evaluation of a digital platform for osteoarthritis treatment: study protocol for a randomised clinical study.

Håkan Nero, Jonas Ranstam, Aliasghar Ahmad Kiadaliri, Leif E Dahlberg

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03328741 nasuspendednot on this map

Evaluation of a Web-based Platform for Osteoarthritis Treatment - a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLund UniversityRan2018 to 2022Enrolled270ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsOnline Osteoarthritis treatment, Face-to-face osteoarthritis treatment
NCT04049318 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effects of a Structured Digital Osteoarthritis Self-management Program After 6 Months of Adherence

TypeobservationalSponsorLund UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled1,709ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, HipArmsEducation+ exercise (delivered digitally)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Future challenges in rheumatology - is telemedicine the solution?Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Håkan NeroOrthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3850-7283
Jonas RanstamOrthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Aliasghar Ahmad KiadaliriClinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Leif E DahlbergJoint Academy, Malmö, Sweden.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite favourable results from structured face-to-face treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) in Sweden through the Better management of patients with OsteoArthritis (BOA) initiative, only around 20% of people with knee or hip OA receive the primary treatment recommended by international guidelines (ie, information, exercise, weight management). In 2014, a digital treatment programme named Joint Academy was introduced in Sweden, based on the same concept as the face-to-face BOA programme. In line with BOA, Joint Academy follows national and international guidelines and best practice for OA treatment. Results from observational studies suggest that this digital treatment is a valuable alternative to the traditional treatment approach and can positively impact patients' function and pain. However, conclusions from such studies commonly suggest that more rigorous testing is necessary to ascertain the benefits of digital treatment delivery for people with OA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised clinical trial will be performed, comparing regular face-to-face care according to BOA with the digital version, Joint Academy. A total of 270 participants with clinically diagnosed knee OA will be recruited at primary care centres and randomised to either standard treatment (BOA) for 3 months, or the experimental group (digital intervention programme). Both groups will receive educational sessions and exercises yet with a difference in programme deliverance. The objective of the trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the online treatment programme, in comparison with BOA. The two treatment groups will be compared with respect to the number of repetitions of the 30 s chair stand test at 3, 6 and 12 months, using a mixed model repeated measures analysis of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been attained from the Regional Board of Ethics in Lund, Sweden (Dnr 2017/719). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03328741.

Indexed as

InternetAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePatient SatisfactionProgram EvaluationQuality of LifeSelf CareTelerehabilitationadult orthopaedicskneetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID30413507
PMCPMC6231565
OpenAlexW2906070540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.