Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413422›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2019

Time-to-event analysis for sports injury research part 1: time-varying exposures.

Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen, Michael Lejbach Bertelsen, Daniel Ramskov, Merete Møller, Adam Hulme, Daniel Theisen, Caroline F Finch, Lauren Victoria Fortington, Mohammad Ali Mansournia, Erik Thorlund Parner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Rasmus Oestergaard NielsenSection for Sports Science, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5757-1806
Michael Lejbach BertelsenSection for Sports Science, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Daniel RamskovSection for Sports Science, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Merete MøllerDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Adam HulmeCentre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, Faculty of Arts, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3305-8538
Daniel TheisenSports Medicine Research Laboratory, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Caroline F FinchAustralian Centre for Research into Injury in Sport and its Prevention, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-1930
Lauren Victoria FortingtonAustralian Centre for Research into Injury in Sport and its Prevention, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-9249
Mohammad Ali MansourniaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Erik Thorlund ParnerSection for Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKEdith Cowan University · AUNeuroscience Institute · ITSports Medicine Australia · AUUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

aimTo discuss advanced statistical methods suitable for the complex analysis of time-varying exposures such as changes in training load and injury-related outcomes. CONTENT: Time-varying exposures and time-varying effect-measure modifiers can be used in time-to-event models to investigate sport injury aetiology. We address four key-questions (i) Does time-to-event modelling allow change in training load to be included as a time-varying exposure for sport injury development? (ii) Why is time-to-event analysis superior to other analytical concepts when analysing training-load related data that changes status over time? (iii) How can researchers include change in training load in a time-to-event analysis? and, (iv) Are researchers able to include other time-varying variables into time-to-event analyses? We emphasise that cleaning datasets, setting up the data, performing analyses with time-varying variables and interpreting the results is time-consuming, and requires dedication. It may need you to ask for assistance from methodological peers as the analytical approaches presented this paper require specialist knowledge and well-honed statistical skills.

conclusionTo increase knowledge about the association between changes in training load and injury, we encourage sports injury researchers to collaborate with statisticians and/or methodological epidemiologists to carefully consider applying time-to-event models to prospective sports injury data. This will ensure appropriate interpretation of time-to-event data.

Indexed as

Physical Conditioning, HumanSports MedicineTime FactorsAthletic InjuriesBiomedical ResearchHumansModels, StatisticalResearch Designinjurystatisticstraining load

Identifiers

PMID30413422
PMCPMC6317442
OpenAlexW2899693514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.