Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413205›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach.

Nancy Pandhi, Sally Kraft, Stephanie Berkson, Sarah Davis, Sandra Kamnetz, Steven Koslov, Elizabeth Trowbridge, William Caplan

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Primary care micro-teams: an international systematic review of patient and healthcare professional perspectives.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. The Impact of Organisational Changes on Teamwork in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy PandhiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, MSC 09 5040, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA. npandhi@salud.unm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0059-801X
Sally KraftPopulation Health at Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 1 Rope Ferry Rd, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Stephanie BerksonPrimary Care Academics Transforming Healthcare Collaborative, Madison, WI, USA.
Sarah DavisPrimary Care Academics Transforming Healthcare Collaborative, Madison, WI, USA.
Sandra KamnetzPrimary Care Academics Transforming Healthcare Collaborative, Madison, WI, USA.
Steven KoslovPrimary Care Academics Transforming Healthcare Collaborative, Madison, WI, USA.
Elizabeth TrowbridgePrimary Care Academics Transforming Healthcare Collaborative, Madison, WI, USA.
William CaplanPrimary Care Academics Transforming Healthcare Collaborative, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USDartmouth College · USNational Patient Safety Foundation · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Wisconsin Health · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY TRENTHAM-DIETZ · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
NCATS NIH HHS 9U54TR000021NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCRR NIH HHS 1UL1RR025011NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth systems in the United States are increasingly required to become leaders in quality to compete successfully in a value-conscious purchasing market. Doing so involves developing effective clinical teams using approaches like the clinical microsystems framework. However, there has been limited assessment of this approach within United States primary care settings.

methodsThis paper describes the implementation, mixed-methods evaluation results, and lessons learned from instituting a Microsystems approach across 6 years with 58 primary care teams at a large Midwestern academic health care system. The evaluation consisted of a longitudinal survey augmented by interviews and focus groups. Structured facilitated longitudinal discussions with leadership captured ongoing lessons learned. Quantitative analysis employed ordinal logistic regression and compared aggregate responses at 6-months and 12-months to those at the baseline period. Qualitative analysis used an immersion/crystallization approach.

resultsSurvey results (N = 204) indicated improved perceptions of: organizational support, team effectiveness and cohesion, meeting and quality improvement skills, and team communication. Thematic challenges from the qualitative data included: lack of time and coverage for participation, need for technical/technology support, perceived devaluation of improvement work, difficulty aggregating or spreading learnings, tensions between team and clinic level change, a part-time workforce, team instability and difficulties incorporating a data driven improvement approach.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that a microsystems approach is valuable for building team relationships and quality improvement skills but is challenged in a large, diverse academic primary care context. They additionally suggest that primary care transformation will require purposeful changes implemented across the micro to macro-level including but not only focused on quality improvement training for microsystem teams.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyDelivery of Health CareFocus GroupsHumansLeadershipPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesMicrosystemsPatient care teamPrimary health careQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID30413205
PMCPMC6230270
OpenAlexW2899762536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.