Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413181›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

ALternatives To prophylactic Antibiotics for the treatment of Recurrent urinary tract infection in women (ALTAR): study protocol for a multicentre, pragmatic, patient-randomised, non-inferiority trial.

Rebecca Forbes, Ased Ali, Alaa Abouhajar, Catherine Brennand, Heather Brown, Sonya Carnell, Thomas Chadwick, Ian Eardley, Jan Lecouturier, Helen Mossop and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of methenamine hippurate to prevent urinary tract infections in community adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Microbiologist in the Clinic: Antibiotic Dependent in her 30 s.International urogynecology journal · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca ForbesNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, 1-4 Claremont Terrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, UK.
Ased AliPinderfields Hospital, Wakefield, WF1 4EE, UK.
Alaa AbouhajarNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, 1-4 Claremont Terrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, UK.
Catherine BrennandNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, 1-4 Claremont Terrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, UK.
Heather BrownInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Sonya CarnellNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, 1-4 Claremont Terrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, UK.
Thomas ChadwickInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Ian EardleySt James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Jan LecouturierInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Helen MossopInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Ian PearceManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Robert PickardInstitute of Cellular Medicine, William Leech Building, The Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH,, UK.
Nikesh ThiruchelvamAddenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Katherine WaltonDepartment of Microbiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK.
Jennifer WilkinsonNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, 1-4 Claremont Terrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, UK.
Chris HardingDepartment of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK. chris.harding@nuth.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-382X
Newcastle University · GBFreeman Hospital · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBCellular Therapeutics (United Kingdom) · GBManchester Royal Infirmary · GBPinderfields Hospital · GBSt James's University Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/13/88/21Health Technology Assessment Programme 13/88/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt least half of all adult women will experience infective cystitis (urinary tract infection: UTI) at least once in their life and many suffer from repeated episodes. Recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) in adult women is usually treated with long-term, low-dose antibiotics and current national and international guidelines recommend this as the 'gold standard' preventative treatment. Although they are reasonably effective, long-term antibiotics can result in bacteria becoming resistant not only to the prescribed antibiotic but to other antimicrobial agents. The problem of antimicrobial resistance is recognised as a global threat and the recent drive for antibiotic stewardship has emphasised the need for careful consideration prior to prescribing antibiotics. This has led clinicians and patients alike to explore potential non-antibiotic options for recurrent UTI prevention. DESIGN /

methodsThis is a multicentre, pragmatic, patient-randomised, non-inferiority trial comparing a non-antibiotic preventative treatment for rUTI in women, methenamine hippurate, against the current standard of daily low-dose antibiotics. Women who require preventative treatment for rUTI are the target population. This group is comprised of those with a diagnosis of rUTI, defined as three episodes in 1 year or two episodes in 6 months, and those with a single severe infection requiring hospitalisation. Participants will be recruited from secondary care urology / urogynaecology departments in the UK following referral with rUTI. Participants will be followed up during a 12-month period of treatment and in the subsequent 6 months following completion of the prophylactic medication. Outcomes will be assessed from patient recorded symptoms, quality of life questionnaires and microbiological examination of urine and perineal swabs. The primary outcome is the incidence of symptomatic antibiotic-treated UTI self-reported by participants during the 12-month period of preventative treatment. Health economic outcomes will also be assessed to define the cost-effectiveness of both treatments. A qualitative study will be conducted in the first 8 months of the trial to explore with participants/non-participants' and recruiting clinicians' views on trial processes and identify potential barriers to recruitment, reasons for participating and non-participation and for dropping out of the study. DISCUSSION: The study was commissioned and funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and approved under the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) notification scheme as a 'Type A' study.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN), registry number: ISRCTN70219762 . Registered on 31 May 2016.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicAdultAgedBiasComputer SecurityEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHippuratesHumansMethenamineMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CareRecurrenceResearch DesignHippuratesMethenaminemethenamine hippurateAntibiotic prophylaxisAntibiotic resistanceEconomic evaluationQualitative researchRandomised controlled trialRCTUrinary tract infectionUTI

Identifiers

PMID30413181
PMCPMC6230276
OpenAlexW2896593381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.