Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413165›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Primary care utilization in people who experience imprisonment in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study.

Fiona G Kouyoumdjian, Stephanie Y Cheng, Kinwah Fung, Stephen Humphreys-Mahaffey, Aaron M Orkin, Claire Kendall, Lori Kiefer, Flora I Matheson, Samantha E Green, Stephen W Hwang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona G KouyoumdjianDavid Braley Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, 5th Floor, 100 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P1H6, Canada. kouyouf@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6869-7516
Stephanie Y ChengICES, Toronto, Canada.
Kinwah FungICES, Toronto, Canada.
Stephen Humphreys-MahaffeyFaculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Aaron M OrkinSchwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada.
Claire KendallICES, Toronto, Canada.
Lori KieferDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Flora I MathesonSt. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Samantha E GreenSt. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Stephen W HwangSt. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to primary care is an important determinant of health, and data are sparse on primary care utilization for people who experience imprisonment. We aimed to describe primary care utilization for persons released from prison, and to compare utilization with the general population.

methodsWe linked correctional data for all persons released from provincial prison in Ontario, Canada in 2010 with health administrative data. We matched each person by age and sex with four general population controls. We compared primary care utilization rates using generalized estimating equations. We adjusted rate ratios for aggregated diagnosis groups, to explore this association independent of comorbidity. We examined the proportion of people using primary care using chi squared tests and time to first primary care visit post-release using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsCompared to the general population controls, the prison release group had significantly increased relative rates of primary care utilization: at 6.1 (95% CI 5.9-6.2) in prison, 3.7 (95% CI 3.6-3.8) in the week post-release and between 2.4 and 2.6 in the two years after prison release. All rate ratios remained significantly increased after adjusting for comorbidity. In the month after release, however, 66.3% of women and 75.5% of men did not access primary care.

conclusionsPrimary care utilization is high in prison and post-release for people who experience imprisonment in Ontario, Canada. Increased use is only partly explained by comorbidity. The majority of people do not access primary care in the month after prison release. Future research should identify reasons for increased use and interventions to improve care access for persons who are not accessing care post-release.

Indexed as

AdultAmbulatory CareChronic DiseaseCommunity Health ServicesFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleOntarioPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CarePrisonersPrisonsRetrospective StudiesHealthcare utilizationPrimary carePrison

Identifiers

PMID30413165
PMCPMC6234797
OpenAlexW2899963491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.