Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413154›Full record

Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2018

Comparison of clinical outcomes of toric intraocular lens, Precizon vs Tecnis: a single center randomized controlled trial.

Na Yeon Jung, Dong Hui Lim, Sung Soon Hwang, Joo Hyun, Tae-Young Chung

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03085901 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lens

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamsung Medical CenterRan2016 to 2016Enrolled40ConditionsAstigmatismArmsPrecizon toric intraocular lens, Tecnis toric intraocular lens
NCT04436198 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Investigation of Capsular Tension Rings in Intraocular Lens Rotation

TypeinterventionalSponsorRachel LiebermanRan2020 to 2023Enrolled12ConditionsCataract, Ophthalmoplegia, Ophthalmologic ComplicationArmsMORCHER® EYEJET® CTR Types 14, 14A, and 14C, Toric IOL Only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of the clinical outcomes of EyecrylIndian journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Toric intraocular lens: A literature review.Taiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Na Yeon JungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, #81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Dong Hui LimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, #81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Sung Soon HwangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, #81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Joo HyunDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, #81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Tae-Young ChungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, #81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea. tychung@skku.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the clinical outcome of Precizon toric intraocular lens (IOL) (Ophtec Inc.) to that of Tecnis toric IOL (Abbott Medical Optics Inc.).

methodsThis randomized comparative study included 40 eyes (Precizon, 20 eyes; Tecnis, 20 eyes) of 40 patients with visually significant cataract and corneal astigmatism who underwent cataract surgery. Changes in uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCDVA), best corrected distant visual acuity (BCDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA), refraction, residual astigmatism, rotation of the IOL axis, and higher order aberrations at 3 months postoperatively were evaluated. Vector analysis was performed using the Alpins method.

resultsBoth groups showed significant reduction in refractive astigmatism after the surgery (Precizon: - 1.06 ± 0.94 Diopter (D) to - 0.31 ± 0.29 D, p = 0.042; Tecnis: - 1.83 ± 1.29 D to - 0.41 ± 0.33 D, p = 0.015). There was no significant (p > 0.05) difference in postoperative UCDVA, BCDVA, or residual astigmatism between the two groups, although a tendency of better UCIVA was observed in the Precizon group. Vector analysis parameters showed no statistically significant difference beween groups(P > 0.05). Significant difference in rotation of toric IOL axis was found between the two groups (Precizon: 1.50° ± 0.84, Tecnis: 2.56° ± 0.68, p = 0.010). Spherical aberration in the Precizon group was significantly (p = 0.005) lower than that in the Tecnis group.

conclusionsThe Precizon toric IOL group had better rotational stability at 3-month postoperatively. Both Precizon toric IOL and Tecnis toric IOL could be effectively used by cataract surgeons to correct preexisting corneal astigmatism through cataract surgery.

trial registrationhttp://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT03085901 , retrospectively registered on 21 March 2017.

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularLens Implantation, IntraocularPhacoemulsificationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAstigmatismBiometryCataractDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignAstigmatismIntraocular LensPrecizonTecnisToric

Identifiers

PMID30413154
PMCPMC6230282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.