Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413150›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2018

Trends in anemia care in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in the United States (2006-2015).

Haesuk Park, Xinyue Liu, Linda Henry, Jeffrey Harman, Edward A Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haesuk ParkDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, HPNP Building Room 3325, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA. hpark@cop.ufl.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3299-8111
Xinyue LiuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, HPNP Building Room 3325, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Linda HenryDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, HPNP Building Room 3325, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Jeffrey HarmanDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.
Edward A RossDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida, College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, 32827, USA.

Funding

Medicaid Prior Authorization Policies for Chronic Hepatitis C Treatment in Vulnerable PopulationsK01DA045618 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PARK, HAESUK · 2018 to 2022
$648k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of the study was to examine overall anemia management trends in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) from 2006 to 2015, and to evaluate the impact of Trial to Reduced Cardiovascular Events with Ananesp Therapy (TREAT)'s study results (October 2009) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s (June 2011) safety warnings and guidelines on the use of ESA therapy in the current treatment of anemia.

methodsA retrospective cohort analysis of anemia management in CKD patients using Truven MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases was conducted. Monthly rates and types of anemia treatment for post-TREAT and post-FDA safety warning periods were compared to pre-TREAT period. Anemia management included ESA, intravenous iron, and blood transfusion. A time-series analysis using Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model and a Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) model were used.

resultsBetween 2006 and 2015, CKD patients were increasingly less likely to be treated with ESAs, more likely to receive intravenous iron supplementation, and blood transfusions. The adjusted probabilities of prescribing ESAs were 31% (odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.71) and 59% (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.42) lower in the post-TREAT and post-FDA warning periods compared to pre-TREAT period. The probability of prescribing intravenous iron was increased in the post-FDA warning period (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.19) although the increase was not statistically significant in the post-TREAT period (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94-1.12). The probabilities of prescribing blood transfusion during the post-TREAT and post-FDA warning periods increased by 14% (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06-1.23) and 31% (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.22-1.39), respectively. Similar trends of prescribing ESAs and iron supplementations were observed in commercially insured CKD patients but the use of blood transfusions did not increase.

conclusionsAfter the 2011 FDA safety warnings, the use of ESA continued to decrease while the use of iron supplementation continued to increase. The use of blood transfusions increased significantly in Medicare patients while it remained stable in commercially insured patients. Results suggest the TREAT publication had effected treatment of anemia prior to the FDA warning but the FDA warning solidified TREAT's recommendations for anemia treatment for non- dialysis dependent CKD patients.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAdultAgedAnemiaBlood TransfusionCohort StudiesDarbepoetin alfaDatabases, FactualErythropoietinFemaleHumansIronMaleMiddle AgedRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRetrospective StudiesDarbepoetin alfaErythropoietinIronAnemiaChronic kidney disease (CKD)Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)FDA safety warnings

Identifiers

PMID30413150
PMCPMC6230235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.