ArticleBMC nephrology2018
Trends in anemia care in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in the United States (2006-2015).
Article in BMC nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Affecting Doses of Roxadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa for Anemia in Nondialysis Patients.American journal of nephrology · 2021Trial
- Genetic Characterization of Blood Group Antigens for Polynesian Heritage Norfolk Island Residents.Genes · 2023Article
- A novel model forecasting perioperative red blood cell transfusion.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Epidemiology and outcomes in patients with anemia of CKD not on dialysis from a large US healthcare system database: a retrospective observational study.BMC nephrology · 2022Observational
- Contemporary outcomes of anemia in US patients with chronic kidney disease.Clinical kidney journal · 2022Article
- Current Status of Renal Anemia Pharmacotherapy-What Can We Offer Today.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Uptake of evidence by physicians: De-adoption of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents after the TREAT trial.BMC nephrology · 2021Article
- Understanding Patient Perspectives and Awareness of the Impact and Treatment of Anemia with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Patient Survey in China.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2021Article
- Burden of Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Beyond Erythropoietin.Advances in therapy · 2021Review
- Red cell transfusion in chronic kidney disease in the United States in the current era of erythropoiesis stimulating agents.Journal of nephrology · 2020Review
- Anemia and clinical outcomes in patients with non-dialysis dependent or dialysis dependent severe chronic kidney disease: a Danish population-based study.Journal of nephrology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of the study was to examine overall anemia management trends in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) from 2006 to 2015, and to evaluate the impact of Trial to Reduced Cardiovascular Events with Ananesp Therapy (TREAT)'s study results (October 2009) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s (June 2011) safety warnings and guidelines on the use of ESA therapy in the current treatment of anemia.
methodsA retrospective cohort analysis of anemia management in CKD patients using Truven MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases was conducted. Monthly rates and types of anemia treatment for post-TREAT and post-FDA safety warning periods were compared to pre-TREAT period. Anemia management included ESA, intravenous iron, and blood transfusion. A time-series analysis using Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model and a Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) model were used.
resultsBetween 2006 and 2015, CKD patients were increasingly less likely to be treated with ESAs, more likely to receive intravenous iron supplementation, and blood transfusions. The adjusted probabilities of prescribing ESAs were 31% (odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.71) and 59% (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.42) lower in the post-TREAT and post-FDA warning periods compared to pre-TREAT period. The probability of prescribing intravenous iron was increased in the post-FDA warning period (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.19) although the increase was not statistically significant in the post-TREAT period (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94-1.12). The probabilities of prescribing blood transfusion during the post-TREAT and post-FDA warning periods increased by 14% (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06-1.23) and 31% (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.22-1.39), respectively. Similar trends of prescribing ESAs and iron supplementations were observed in commercially insured CKD patients but the use of blood transfusions did not increase.
conclusionsAfter the 2011 FDA safety warnings, the use of ESA continued to decrease while the use of iron supplementation continued to increase. The use of blood transfusions increased significantly in Medicare patients while it remained stable in commercially insured patients. Results suggest the TREAT publication had effected treatment of anemia prior to the FDA warning but the FDA warning solidified TREAT's recommendations for anemia treatment for non- dialysis dependent CKD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.