Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30413046›Full record

ReviewToxins2018

Insect Antimicrobial Peptides, a Mini Review.

Qinghua Wu, Jiří Patočka, Kamil Kuča

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 205 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
205citing papers in PubMed
25.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

205 citing papers in PubMed, 468 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effects of Defatted Black Soldier Fly (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Valorization of Agricultural Residues Through Nutrient Enrichment for Animal Farming.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Mechanism, Efficacy, and Safety of Natural Antibiotics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  19. Peptide-Based Strategies AgainstPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

145 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qinghua WuCollege of Life Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China. wqh212@hotmail.com.
Jiří PatočkaDepartment of Radiology and Toxicology, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, University of South Bohemia, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic. toxicology@toxicology.cz.
Kamil KučaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. kamil.kuca@uhk.cz.ORCID 0000-0001-9664-1109
University of Hradec Králové · CZUniversity of South Bohemia in České Budějovice · CZYangtze University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are crucial effectors of the innate immune system. They provide the first line of defense against a variety of pathogens. AMPs display synergistic effects with conventional antibiotics, and thus present the potential for combined therapies. Insects are extremely resistant to bacterial infections. Insect AMPs are cationic and comprise less than 100 amino acids. These insect peptides exhibit an antimicrobial effect by disrupting the microbial membrane and do not easily allow microbes to develop drug resistance. Currently, membrane mechanisms underlying the antimicrobial effects of AMPs are proposed by different modes: the barrel-stave mode, toroidal-pore, carpet, and disordered toroidal-pore are the typical modes. Positive charge quantity, hydrophobic property and the secondary structure of the peptide are important for the antibacterial activity of AMPs. At present, several structural families of AMPs from insects are known (defensins, cecropins, drosocins, attacins, diptericins, ponericins, metchnikowins, and melittin), but new AMPs are frequently discovered. We reviewed the biological effects of the major insect AMPs. This review will provide further information that facilitates the study of insect AMPs and shed some light on novel microbicides.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsBacterial InfectionsInsectaAnti-Infective AgentsAMPantimicrobial peptidesmechanism of actionmodificationStructure-activity relationship

Identifiers

PMID30413046
PMCPMC6267271
OpenAlexW2899890541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.