Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30412654›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2019

Long-term outcomes of eculizumab-treated positive crossmatch recipients: Allograft survival, histologic findings, and natural history of the donor-specific antibodies.

Carrie A Schinstock, Andrew J Bentall, Byron H Smith, Lynn D Cornell, Matthew Everly, Manish J Gandhi, Mark D Stegall

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Lung Transplantation: Diagnosis and Therapeutic Armamentarium in a 21st Century Perspective.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carrie A SchinstockDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-3274-3277
Andrew J BentallDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-8495-9782
Byron H SmithDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-9318-2437
Lynn D CornellDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Matthew EverlyTerasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7392-5483
Manish J GandhiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-6921-6123
Mark D StegallWilliam J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

ZESTRIL VS. VERAPAMIL IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSIONM01RR000585 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 1985 to 2006
$30.4M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002379 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2017 to 2026
$14.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002379NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to determine the long-term outcomes of eculizumab-treated, positive crossmatch (+XM) kidney transplant recipients compared with +XM and age-matched negative crossmatch (-XM) controls. We performed an observational retrospective study and examined allograft survival, histologic findings, long-term B-cell flow cytometric XM (BFXM), and allograft-loss-associated factors. The mean (SD) posttransplant follow-up was 6.3 (2.5) years in the eculizumab group; 7.6 (3.5), +XM control group; 7.9 (2.5), -XM control group. The overall and death-censored allograft survival rates were similar in +XM groups (P = .73, P = .48) but reduced compared with -XM control patients (P < .001, P < .001). In the eculizumab-treated group, 57.9% (11/19) of the allografts had chronic antibody-mediated rejection, but death-censored allograft survival was 76.6%, 5 years; 75.4%, 7 years. Baseline IgG3 positivity and BFXM ≥300 were associated with allograft loss. C1q positivity was also associated with allograft loss but did not reach statistical significance. Donor-specific antibodies appeared to decrease in eculizumab-treated patients. After excluding patients with posttransplant plasmapheresis, 42.3% (9/21) had negative BFXMs; 31.8% (7/22), completely negative single-antigen beads 1 year posttransplant. Eculizumab-treated +XM patients had reduced allograft survival compared with -XM controls but similar survival to +XM controls. BFXM and complement-activating donor-specific antibodies (by IgG3 and C1q testing) may be used for risk stratification in +XM transplantation.

Indexed as

AdultAllograftsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedB-LymphocytesCase-Control StudiesComplement C1qComplement Inactivating AgentsFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHistocompatibility TestingHLA AntigensHumansIsoantibodiesKidneyKidney TransplantationAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplement C1qComplement Inactivating AgentseculizumabHLA AntigensIsoantibodiesalloantibodyclinical research/practicedesensitizationhistocompatibilitykidney transplantation/nephrologyorgan transplantation in generalprotocol biopsyrejection: antibody-mediated (ABMR)rejection: chronic

Identifiers

PMID30412654
PMCPMC6509017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.