ArticlePloS one2018
Intraphagolysosomal conditions predispose to Staphylococcus epidermidis small colony variants persistence in macrophages.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Staphylococcal trafficking and infection-from 'nose to gut' and back.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2022Review
- The road to success of coagulase-negative staphylococci: clinical significance of small colony variants and their pathogenic role in persistent infections.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021Review
- Distinct clonal lineages and within-host diversification shape invasive Staphylococcus epidermidis populations.PLoS pathogens · 2021Article
- Spontaneously Occurring Small-Colony Variants ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- The Vacuolating Autotransporter Toxin (Vat) ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Staphylococcus epidermidis small colony variants can survive inside macrophages and their survival has been proposed as a pivotal process in the pathogenesis of biomaterial associated infections. In the present study the intracellular location of clinical isolates of SCV and parental wild type strains inside macrophages was determined. Furthermore, the effect of IFN-γ and rapamycin on the level of SCV/WT as well as lysosomes colocalisation and iNOS induction in THP-activated macrophages in response to WT and SCV strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis were examined. It was demonstrated that SCV strain of S. epidermidis can survive and persist inside macrophages and its intracellular survival is supported by the induction of phagosomal acidification. The ability to reduce the high proportion of LysoTracker positive SCV containing phagosomes was exclusively found when IFN-γ was used. The findings suggest that IFN-γ mediates SCV killing via two distinct mechanisms, phagosome alkalisation and an increased iNOS synthesis, so the cytokine may control S. epidermidis WT and SCV infection in macrophages. Staphylococcus epidermidis SCV is a less potent stimulus of iNOS than the WT strain and the feature may help SCV to persist in hostile environment of macrophages. Rapamycin treatment did not influence the iNOS synthesis but reduced the percentage of both bacterial strains within acidic organelles. However, the percentage of SCV within LysoTracker positive organelles, even though reduced comparing to non-primed cells, was higher than in the WT strain indicating that Staphylococcus epidermidis possesses unique metabolic features allowing SCV to survive within macrophages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.