Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30412607›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

MR findings of microvascular perfusion in infarcted and remote myocardium early after successful primary PCI.

Anne Bethke, Limalanathan Shanmuganathan, Christian Shetelig, David Swanson, Geir Øystein Andersen, Jan Eritsland, Nils Einar Kløw, Pavel Hoffmann

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne BethkeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostics and Intervention, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7419-1899
Limalanathan ShanmuganathanFeiring Heart Clinic, Feiring, Norway.
Christian SheteligInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
David SwansonInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Geir Øystein AndersenFeiring Heart Clinic, Feiring, Norway.
Jan EritslandFeiring Heart Clinic, Feiring, Norway.
Nils Einar KløwDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostics and Intervention, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6042-402X
Pavel HoffmannSection for Interventional Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate CMR myocardial first-pass perfusion in the injured region as well as the non-infarcted area in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients few days after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MATERIALS AND

methods220 patients with first time STEMI successfully treated with PCI (with or without postconditioning) were recruited from the Postconditioning in STEMI study. Contrast enhanced CMR was performed at a 1.5 T scanner 2 (1-5) days after PCI. On myocardial first-pass perfusion imaging signal intensity (SI) was measured in the injured area and in the remote myocardium and maximum contrast enhancement index (MCE) was calculated. MCE = (peak SI after contrast-SI at baseline) / SI at baseline x 100.

resultsThere were no significant differences in first-pass perfusion between patients treated with standard PCI and patients treated with additional postconditioning. The injured myocardium showed a significantly lower MCE compared to remote myocardium (94 ± 55 vs. 113 ± 49; p < 0.001). When patients were divided into four quartiles of MCE in the injured myocardium (MCE injured myocardium), patients with low MCE injured myocardium had: significantly lower ejection fraction (EF) than patients with high MCE injured myocardium, larger infarct size and area at risk, smaller myocardial salvage and more frequent occurrence of microvascular obstruction on late gadolinium enhancement. MCE in the remote myocardium revealed that patients with larger infarction also had significantly decreased MCE in the non-infarcted, remote area.

conclusionCMR first-pass perfusion can be impaired in both injured and remote myocardium in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. These findings indicate that CMR first-pass perfusion may be a feasible method to evaluate myocardial injury after STEMI in addition to conventional CMR parameters.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingPercutaneous Coronary InterventionContrast MediaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGadolinium DTPAHeartHumansIschemic PostconditioningMaleMiddle AgedST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTreatment OutcomeContrast MediaGadolinium DTPA

Identifiers

PMID30412607
PMCPMC6226160
OpenAlexW2900243633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.