ArticlePloS one2018
Novel models for prediction of benefit and toxicity with FOLFIRINOX treatment of pancreatic cancer using clinically available parameters.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Activity of a Novel Compound against Prostate and Pancreatic Cancer.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A novel validated prognostic score to facilitate treatment decision-making in real-world.International journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Major histocompatibility complex class I molecule expression by pancreatic cancer cells is regulated by activation and inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor.Immunologic research · 2022Article
- Rutin and Quercetin Counter Doxorubicin-Induced Liver Toxicity in Wistar RatsOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Article
- Body mass index (BMI) and outcome of metastatic melanoma patients receiving targeted therapy and immunotherapy: a multicenter international retrospective study.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2020Article
- Use of zebrafish embryos as avatar of patients with pancreatic cancer: A new xenotransplantation model towards personalized medicine.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Prognostic and predictive factors in pancreatic cancer.Oncotarget · 2020Review
- Moving the Target on the Optimal Adjuvant Strategy for Resected Pancreatic Cancers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2020Review
- Implications for Tumor Microenvironment and Epithelial Crosstalk in the Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers.Journal of oncology · 2019Review
- Non-pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin as Palliative Chemotherapy in pre-Treated Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Twenty-Eight Patients.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite modern chemotherapy regimens, survival of pancreatic cancer patients remains dismal. Toxicity is a major concern and it is a challenge to upfront identify patients with the highest benefit from aggressive polychemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate ORR and side effects of the FOLFIRINOX regimen, highlighting dose modification and to explore possible prognostic response factors as a clinical tool.
methodsThis retrospective study includes 123 patients with metastatic PC that were treated with FOLFIRINOX between the years 2007 to 2016 in a single academic institution. Survival rates were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic models including laboratory and clinical parameters were calculated using Cox proportional models in univariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsMedian age at diagnosis was 64 years (47-78 years), 71 (57, 7%) were male and the majority had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 (63 patients; 83.7%). After a median follow up of 17.8 months, median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.7 (4.55-6.84; 95%CI) and 11.8 months (9.35-14.24; 95%CI) respectively. Overall response rate with FOLFIRINOX was 34.9% and stable disease rate was 21.9%. Regarding Grade 3/4 side effects, 62 events, were reported in 37 patients. Looking at risk factors e.g. patient characteristics, tumor marker, inflammatory markers and body composition multivariate analyses proved CEA >4 elevation and BMI > 25 at the time point before palliative chemotherapy to be independent negative prognostic factors for OS. Grouping patients with no risk factor, one or two of these risk factors we analyzed a median OS of 17.4 moths, 9.6 months and 6.7 months (p<0.001) respectively. In addition we identified thrombocytosis and low BMI as predictors of early toxicity.
conclusionThis study identifies two easily available factors influencing overall survival with FOLFIRINOX therapy. By combining these two factors to create a score for OS, we propose a prognostic tool for physicians to identify patients, who are unlikely to benefit more from FOLFIRINOX or likely to experience toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.