Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30412585›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Characterization of Campylobacter spp. isolated from wild birds in the Antarctic and Sub-Antarctic.

Håkan Johansson, Patrik Ellström, Karin Artursson, Charlotte Berg, Jonas Bonnedahl, Ingrid Hansson, Jorge Hernandez, Juana Lopez-Martín, Gonzalo Medina-Vogel, Lucila Moreno and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Veterinary sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Håkan JohanssonCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Patrik EllströmZoonosis Science Center, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8920-6061
Karin ArturssonNational Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Charlotte BergDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skara, Sweden.
Jonas BonnedahlCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Ingrid HanssonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jorge HernandezZoonosis Science Center, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Juana Lopez-MartínDepartamento de Patología y Medicina Preventiva, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Concepción, Chillán, Chile.
Gonzalo Medina-VogelCentro de Investigación para la Sustentabilidad, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Lucila MorenoFacultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Björn OlsenZoonosis Science Center, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Eva Olsson EngvallNational Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hanna SkarinNational Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Karin TroellNational Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jonas WaldenströmCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Joakim ÅgrenNational Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Daniel González-AcuñaFacultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Concepción, Chillán, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-2397-2991

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lack of knowledge of naturally occurring pathogens is limiting our ability to use the Antarctic to study the impact human-mediated introduction of infectious microorganisms have on this relatively uncontaminated environment. As no large-scale coordinated effort to remedy this lack of knowledge has taken place, we rely on smaller targeted efforts to both study present microorganisms and monitor the environment for introductions. In one such effort, we isolated Campylobacter species from fecal samples collected from wild birds in the Antarctic Peninsula and the sub-Antarctic island of South Georgia. Indeed, in South Georgia, we found Campylobacter lari and the closely related Campylobacter peloridis, but also distantly related human-associated multilocus sequence types of Campylobacter jejuni. In contrast, in the Antarctic Peninsula, we found C. lari and two closely related species, Campylobacter subantarcticus and Campylobacter volucris, but no signs of human introduction. In fact, our finding of human-associated sequence types of C. jejuni in South Georgia, but not in the Antarctic Peninsula, suggests that efforts to limit the spread of infectious microorganisms to the Antarctic have so far been successful in preventing the introduction of C. jejuni. However, we do not know how it came to South Georgia and whether the same mode of introduction could spread it from there to the Antarctic Peninsula.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntarctic RegionsBirdsCampylobacterGene Frequency

Identifiers

PMID30412585
PMCPMC6226163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.