ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Comparative structural dynamic analysis of GTPases.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wavelet coherence phase analysis decodes the universal switching mechanism of Ras GTPase superfamily.iScience · 2023Article
- Overview of Apoptosis, Autophagy, and Inflammatory Processes inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Statistical learning of protein elastic network from positional covariance matrix.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Wordom update 2: A user-friendly program for the analysis of molecular structures and conformational ensembles.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Delineating the RAS Conformational Landscape.Cancer research · 2022Article
- A topological data analytic approach for discovering biophysical signatures in protein dynamics.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- How Do Hexokinases Inhibit Receptor-Mediated Apoptosis?Biology · 2022Review
- Highly deregulated lncRNA LOC is associated with overall worse prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma patients.Journal of Cancer · 2021Article
- The Bio3D packages for structural bioinformatics.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- Cellular prion protein gene polymorphisms linked to differential scrapie susceptibility correlate with distinct residue connectivity between secondary structure elements.Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics · 2021Article
- Dynamically encoded reactivity of Ras enzymes: opening new frontiers for drug discovery.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2020Review
- Dual role of a GTPase conformational switch for membrane fusion by mitofusin ubiquitylation.Life science alliance · 2020Article
- KRAS and MET in non-small-cell lung cancer: two of the new kids on the 'drivers' block.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
GTPases regulate a multitude of essential cellular processes ranging from movement and division to differentiation and neuronal activity. These ubiquitous enzymes operate by hydrolyzing GTP to GDP with associated conformational changes that modulate affinity for family-specific binding partners. There are three major GTPase superfamilies: Ras-like GTPases, heterotrimeric G proteins and protein-synthesizing GTPases. Although they contain similar nucleotide-binding sites, the detailed mechanisms by which these structurally and functionally diverse superfamilies operate remain unclear. Here we compare and contrast the structural dynamic mechanisms of each superfamily using extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and subsequent network analysis approaches. In particular, dissection of the cross-correlations of atomic displacements in both the GTP and GDP-bound states of Ras, transducin and elongation factor EF-Tu reveals analogous dynamic features. This includes similar dynamic communities and subdomain structures (termed lobes). For all three proteins the GTP-bound state has stronger couplings between equivalent lobes. Network analysis further identifies common and family-specific residues mediating the state-specific coupling of distal functional sites. Mutational simulations demonstrate how disrupting these couplings leads to distal dynamic effects at the nucleotide-binding site of each family. Collectively our studies extend current understanding of GTPase allosteric mechanisms and highlight previously unappreciated similarities across functionally diverse families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.