ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2019
Mode of Delivery Preference Among Pregnant Nulliparous Women.
Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean delivery on maternal request and its effect on maternal and foetal outcomes in selected tertiary care hospital, Odisha, Southeastern India.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Preferences for childbirth delivery and pain relief methods among pregnant women in Vietnam.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Mode of delivery preferences: the role of childbirth fear among nulliparous women.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Factors Influencing Polish Women's Preference for the Mode of Delivery and Shared-Decision Making: Has Anything Changed over the Last Decade?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- A Decade of Wishes-Changes in Maternal Preference of the Mode of Delivery among Polish Women over the Last Decade.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Delivery Mode Preference and Associated Factors among Pregnant Mothers in Harar Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.BioMed research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.