Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30412261›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2018

Updates in prognostic markers for gliomas.

Elisa Aquilanti, Julie Miller, Sandro Santagata, Daniel P Cahill, Priscilla K Brastianos

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Progesterone boosts abiraterone-driven target and NK cell therapies against glioblastoma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Imaging diagnosis and treatment selection for brain tumors in the era of molecular therapeutics.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Review
  19. Biomedicines · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa AquilantiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Julie MillerDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sandro SantagataDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel P CahillDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Priscilla K BrastianosDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBroad Institute · US

Funding

Physician Scientist Training in Cancer ResearchT32CA009172 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI Jennifer R Brown, James A. DeCaprio · 1985 to 2026
$17.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults. The traditional classification of gliomas has been based on histologic features and tumor grade. The advent of sophisticated molecular diagnostic techniques has led to a deeper understanding of genomic drivers implicated in gliomagenesis, some of which have important prognostic implications. These advances have led to an extensive revision of the World Health Organization classification of diffuse gliomas to include molecular markers such as isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation, 1p/19q codeletion, and histone mutations as integral components of brain tumor classification. Here, we report a comprehensive analysis of molecular prognostic factors for patients with gliomas, including those mentioned above, but also extending to others such as telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation, glioma cytosine-phosphate-guanine island methylator phenotype DNA methylation, and epidermal growth factor receptor alterations.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19DNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesErbB ReceptorsGene DeletionGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticBiomarkers, TumorDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTelomeraseTERT protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30412261
PMCPMC6225747
OpenAlexW2899707307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.