Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30412224›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2018

Colorectal premalignancy is associated with consensus molecular subtypes 1 and 2.

K Chang, J A Willis, J Reumers, M W Taggart, F A San Lucas, S Thirumurthi, P Kanth, D A Delker, C H Hagedorn, P M Lynch and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Challenges of Consensus Molecular Subtype CMS4 Colon Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Clusterin Expression in Colorectal Carcinomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

K ChangDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
J A WillisHematology and Oncology Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
J ReumersJanssen Oncology Research & Development, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgium.
M W TaggartDepartment of Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
F A San LucasDepartment of Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
S ThirumurthiDepartment of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
P KanthDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, USA.
D A DelkerDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, USA.
C H HagedornCentral Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.
P M LynchDepartment of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
L M EllisGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
E T HawkDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
P A ScheetGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
S KopetzGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of GI Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
J ArtsJanssen Oncology Research & Development, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgium.
J GuinneySage Bionetworks, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA.
R DienstmannSage Bionetworks, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA; Oncology Data Science (ODysSey) Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: rdienstmann@vhio.net.
E VilarDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of GI Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. Electronic address: evilar@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USJanssen (Belgium) · BESage Bionetworks · USUniversity of Utah · USCentral Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
R25 SUPPLEMENT IN GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY EDUCATIONR25CA057730 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHANG, SHINE · 1992 to 2016
$18.6M
TRAINING FOR ACADEMIC ONCOLOGY/HEMATOLOGYT32CA009666 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Michael Davies, Courtney DiNardo · 1994 to 2026
$9.8M
Uncovering Gene Expression Differences between Benign and Premalignant Colorectal PolypsR21CA208461 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI VILAR SANCHEZ, EDUARDO · 2017 to 2018
$395k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R21 CA208461NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057730NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gene expression-based profiling of colorectal cancer (CRC) can be used to identify four molecularly homogeneous consensus molecular subtype (CMS) groups with unique biologic features. However, its applicability to colorectal premalignant lesions remains unknown. Patients and methods: We assembled the largest transcriptomic premalignancy dataset by integrating different public and proprietary cohorts of adenomatous and serrated polyps from sporadic (N = 311) and hereditary (N = 78) patient populations and carried out a comprehensive analysis of carcinogenesis pathways using the CMS random forest (RF) classifier. Results: Overall, transcriptomic subtyping of sporadic and hereditary polyps revealed CMS2 and CMS1 subgroups as the predominant molecular subtypes in premalignancy. Pathway enrichment analysis showed that adenomatous polyps from sporadic or hereditary cases (including Lynch syndrome) displayed a CMS2-like phenotype with WNT and MYC activation, whereas hyperplastic and serrated polyps with CMS1-like phenotype harbored prominent immune activation. Rare adenomas with CMS4-like phenotype showed significant enrichment for stromal signatures along with transforming growth factor-β activation. There was a strong association of CMS1-like polyps with serrated pathology, right-sided anatomic location and BRAF mutations. Conclusions: Based on our observations made in premalignancy, we propose a model of pathway activation associated with CMS classification in colorectal carcinogenesis. Specifically, while adenomatous polyps are largely CMS2, most hyperplastic and serrated polyps are CMS1 and may transition into other CMS groups during evolution into carcinomas. Our findings shed light on the transcriptional landscape of premalignant colonic polyps and may help guide the development of future biomarkers or preventive treatments for CRC.

Indexed as

MutationAdenomaBiomarkers, TumorColonic PolypsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPhenotypePrecancerous ConditionsPredictive Value of TestsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID30412224
PMCPMC6225810
OpenAlexW2888347846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.