Observational studyMedicine2018
Diabetes management in a Primary Care Network (PCN) of private general practitioners in Singapore: An observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypertension in Adults With Diabetes in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the impact, implementation experience and political economy of primary care networks in Kenya: protocol for a mixed methods study.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Article
- Perceived facilitators and barriers to chronic disease management in primary care networks of Singapore: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Primary Care Networks and Starfield's 4Cs: A Case for Enhanced Chronic Disease Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Perceptions and practices of general practitioners on providing oral health care to people with diabetes - a qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A Primary Care Network (PCN) is a virtual network of general practitioners (GPs), sharing common resources and common clinical governance framework for effective chronic disease management. In this study, we analyzed the frequency of assessment as well as control of HbA1c, blood pressure (BP), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) over time among adult patients with diabetes managed by a group of private GPs under PCN.Data, including clinical measurements of HbA1c, BP, and LDL from 2012 to 2015, of 943 subjects at 9 GP clinics that piloted PCN in Singapore in 2012 was obtained from the chronic disease register for this analysis.The total number of PCN patients increased from 371 in 2012 to 911 in 2015. The average HbA1c decreased from 7.5% in 2012 to 7.3% in 2015, with a significant yearly improving trend of -0.11% (P < .001). The trends in change for systolic BP and LDL were not statistically significant during the same follow-up period. Regular assessment of HbA1c decreased from 80% in 2012 to 55% in 2015. Such decreases were also found in BP and LDL assessments. We also found that receiving government subsidies under a national scheme was a major determinant for maintaining regular assessment, with patients so covered 3 to 20 times more likely to have regular assessments.The PCN model can help improve care and clinical outcomes in adult patients with diabetes in the private primary care sector. Investing greater financial and human resources to augment service capacity and expanding subsidy coverage may be important to ensure the effectiveness, scalability, and sustainability of such a model of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.