SynthesisMedicine2018
Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose bone marrow uptake in patients with solid tumors: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024Article
- The other immuno-PET: Metabolic tracers in evaluation of immune responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- The value ofOncology letters · 2020Article
- Bone Marrow and Tumor Radiomics atRadiology · 2019Article
- Effect of F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake by Bone Marrow on the Prognosis of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies have reported the prognostic value of F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) bone marrow uptake (BMU) measured by F-FDG positron emission tomography (F-FDG PET) in various cancers. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of F-FDG BMU in patients with solid tumors.
methodsSystematic searches of MEDLINE and Embase databases were performed using the keywords "F-FDG," "bone marrow," and "prognosis." All published human studies of the prognostic value of F-FDG BMU in patients with solid tumors were searched. The primary outcome was event-free survival (EFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS); both of these were extracted directly from each study. The effects of F-FDG BMU on survival were assessed by using hazard ratios (HRs).
resultsTen studies with 1197 patients (8 studies reporting EFS in 1096 patients and 7 studies reporting OS in 836 patients) were included. In the EFS analysis, the combined HR was 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-2.11, P < .00001) in the random effects model (I = 51%, P = .05). The combined HR of OS was 1.40 (95% CI: 1.13-1.73, P = .002) in the random effects model (I = 52%, P = .05).
conclusionThis meta-analysis has demonstrated that patients with a low level of F-FDG BMU have better EFS and OS than those with a high level of F-FDG BMU. Based on our results, we suggest that F-FDG BMU could be used as a biomarker for stratifying the risk of tumor progression in patients with solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.