Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30412058›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Xue Jia, Wen Zeng, Qin Zhang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A scoping review of clinical reasoning research with Asian healthcare professionals.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xue JiaPostgraduate Department of West China School of Medicine of Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R. China.
Wen Zeng
Qin Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness of the combined administration of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching models in Chinese medical education. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched the following Chinese electronic databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, China Science Periodical Database, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database. We also searched the following English electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Search Engine. We searched for published studies involving the combined administration of PBL+LBL teaching models in Chinese medical education. All randomized controlled trials were included. The focus of the meta-analysis was on the outcomes of knowledge scores, skill scores, medical writing scores, comprehensive ability scores and teaching satisfaction. A subgroup analysis was also performed.

resultsA total of 23 RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 2589 medical students. The PBL+LBL teaching model significantly increased knowledge scores (95% CI, 2.85-5.78; P < .00001), skill scores (95% CI, 0.51-3.71; P = .01), medical writing scores (95% CI, 1.04-4.04; P = .0009), comprehensive ability scores (95% CI, 2.04-8.71; P = .002) and teaching satisfaction (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59; P = .003) compared with the LBL teaching model alone. Additionally, a subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the effect of PBL+LBL on knowledge scores, medical writing scores, and comprehensive ability scores when comparing practical and theoretical courses. Another subgroup analysis that looked at the level of training showed that the PBL+LBL teaching model also significantly improved the knowledge scores of Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior and Masters students. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsBased on the current evidence, this meta-analysis showed that the PBL+LBL teaching model is an effective way to increase knowledge scores, skill scores, medical writing scores, and comprehensive ability scores and to improve teaching satisfaction.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicStudents, MedicalChinaEducational MeasurementEducation, MedicalHumansLearningProblem-Based Learning

Identifiers

PMID30412058
PMCPMC6221680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.