Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30411976›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative effectiveness research2018

Development and validation of the Person-Centeredness of Research Scale.

Consuelo H Wilkins, Victoria Villalta-Gil, Mckenzie M Houston, Yvonne Joosten, Alan Richmond, Yolanda C Vaughn, Sarah C Stallings, Kenneth A Wallston

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A taxonomy of impacts on clinical and translational research from community stakeholder engagement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Consuelo H WilkinsMeharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 37208, Nashville, TN, USA.
Victoria Villalta-GilMeharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 37208, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mckenzie M HoustonMeharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 37208, Nashville, TN, USA.
Yvonne JoostenDepartment of Medicine. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 37232, Nashville, TN, USA.
Alan RichmondCommunity Campus Partners for Health, 27605, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Yolanda C VaughnNeighborhoods Resource Center, 37228, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sarah C StallingsMeharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 37208, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kenneth A WallstonDepartment of Medicine. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 37232, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Technologies and Resources CoreU54MD007593 · NIMHD · MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI ADUNYAH, SAMUEL EVANS · 2012 to 2018
$24.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPerson-centeredness shifts the focus of healthcare and research to the needs and priorities of patients and communities, and may improve health outcomes. There are no instruments available, however, with which we can assess the degree to which research is indeed person-centered. Our aim was to develop and validate a quantitative instrument to rate person-centeredness of research. MATERIALS &

methodsScale development and validation entailed a multistep approach that led to the seven-item Person Centeredness of Research Scale (PCoR Scale) that uses a 5-point Likert rating scale. The scale was validated using ratings of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded research abstracts or abstracts submitted to a translational science meeting.

resultsPsychometric properties of the PCoR Scale showed high internal consistency (α = 0.96). All seven items were highly correlated with the total score (rs range from 0.63 to 0.90). An exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that all of the items loaded on a single factor, explaining 80% of the variance. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded research abstracts had a mean PCoR Scale score of 6.52 (±8.01) that was significantly higher than the abstracts submitted to the translational science meeting (-2.56 (±9.18); t = 8.09; p < 0.0001). Inter-rater reliability in the validation of the revised instrument was high (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC]

conclusionThis brief, quantitative rating scale is the first to assess the main constructs that describe person-centeredness of research products. The PCoR Scale can be used to assess person-centeredness in research products; for example, by funders evaluating proposals, data networks evaluating data requests or researchers evaluating their research designs.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentComparative Effectiveness ResearchDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairespatient-centeredperson-centeredresearchscale developmentscale validation

Identifiers

PMID30411976
PMCPMC6615408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.