ArticleCancer medicine2018
Pathological tumor infiltrative pattern and sites of initial recurrence in stage II/III gastric cancer: Propensity score matching analysis of a multi-institutional dataset.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive bioinformatic analysis of mind bomb 1 gene in stomach adenocarcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Extracellular volume fraction determined by equilibrium contrast-enhanced computed tomography: correlation with histopathological findings in gastric cancer.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Prognostic significance of serum inflammation indices for different tumor infiltrative pattern types of gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Computed Tomography Texture Features and Risk Factor Analysis of Postoperative Recurrence of Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer after Radical Treatment under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Short-term outcomes of gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage III gastric cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of a multi-institutional database.Surgery today · 2021Article
- LGR5 expression is associated with prognosis in poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Article
- Risk Assessment and Preventive Treatment for Peritoneal Recurrence Following Radical Resection for Gastric Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Inhibition of circRNA circVPS33B Reduces Warburg Effect and Tumor Growth Through Regulating the miR-873-5p/HNRNPK Axis in Infiltrative Gastric Cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2021Article
- Article
- Multi-institutional analysis of the prognostic significance of postoperative complications after curative resection for gastric cancer.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- The prognostic value of gastrointestinal bleeding in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A propensity score matching analysis.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- Pathological tumor infiltrative pattern and sites of initial recurrence in stage II/III gastric cancer: Propensity score matching analysis of a multi-institutional dataset.Cancer medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvanced gastric cancer frequently recurs even after radical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between pathological infiltrative pattern (INF) and initial recurrence patterns in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer using a large multicenter database.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1098 eligible patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for stage II/III gastric cancer at nine institutions between 2010 and 2014. Patients were categorized into the INF-a/b and INF-c groups and adjusted using propensity score matching.
resultsAfter propensity score matching, 686 patients (343 for each) were classified in the INF-a/b and INF-c groups. There were no significant differences in overall and disease-free survival between the two groups. In the INF-a/b group, frequencies of recurrence at the peritoneum, lymph node, and liver were equivalent. In contrast, the peritoneum was the most frequent site and accounted for 60% of the total recurrences in the INF-c group. The cumulative peritoneal recurrence rate was significantly higher in the INF-c group than in the INF-a/b group (hazard ratio 2.47). INF-c was a significant risk factor for peritoneal recurrences in most subgroups including age, sex, macroscopic type, tumor differentiation, and disease stage, and whether the postoperative treatment was given. Multivariate analysis identified INF-c as an independent risk factor for peritoneal recurrences. The cumulative liver recurrence rate was significantly higher in the INF-a/b group than in the INF-c group (hazard ratio 3.44).
conclusionsINF may represent an important predictor of recurrence patterns after curative resection of stage II/III gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.