Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30411247›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2019

Cervical disc herniation: which surgery?

Simon Mazas, Ahmed Benzakour, Jean-Etienne Castelain, Camille Damade, Soufiane Ghailane, Olivier Gille

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The influence of preoperative 12-item veterans rand physical component scores on outcomes following cervical disc replacement.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Percutaneous endoscopic Key-Hole technology for treatment of paracentral cervical disc herniation].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon MazasService de chirurgie orthopédique, Unité Rachis 1, CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France. sim.mazas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-0557
Ahmed BenzakourService de chirurgie orthopédique, Unité Rachis 1, CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Etienne CastelainService de chirurgie orthopédique, Unité Rachis 1, CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.
Camille DamadeService de chirurgie orthopédique, Unité Rachis 1, CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.
Soufiane GhailaneService de chirurgie orthopédique, Unité Rachis 1, CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.
Olivier GilleService de chirurgie orthopédique, Unité Rachis 1, CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.
Hôpital Pellegrin · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCervical disc herniation is a common pathology. It can be treated by different surgical procedures. We aimed to list and analyzed every available surgical option. We focused on the comparison between anterior cervical decompression and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty.

resultsThe anterior approach is the most commonly used to achieve decompression and fusion by the mean of autograft or cage that could also be combined with anterior plating. Anterior procedures without fusion have shown good outcomes but are limited by post-operative cervicalgia and kyphotic events. Posterior cervical foraminotomy achieved good outcomes but is not appropriate in a case of a central hernia or ossification of the posterior ligament. Cervical disc arthroplasty is described to decrease the rate of adjacent segment degeneration. It became very popular during the last decades with numerous studies with different implant device showing encouraging results but it has not proved its superiority to anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Anterior bone loss and heterotopic ossification are still to be investigated.

conclusionAnterior cervical decompression and fusion remain the gold standard for surgical treatment of cervical disc herniation.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeSpinal FusionArthroplastyDecompression, SurgicalFemaleForaminotomyFracture Fixation, InternalHumansIntervertebral Disc DegenerationIntervertebral Disc DisplacementMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainNeurosurgical ProceduresOssification, HeterotopicProstheses and ImplantsAnterior cervical decompressionCervical disc arthroplastyCervical disc herniation

Identifiers

PMID30411247
OpenAlexW2899718513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.