Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30411190›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2019

Detecting Associations Between Ciliated Protists and Prokaryotes with Culture-Independent Single-Cell Microbiomics: a Proof-of-Concept Study.

Alessia Rossi, Alessio Bellone, Sergei I Fokin, Vittorio Boscaro, Claudia Vannini

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Alessia RossiDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alessio BelloneDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Sergei I FokinDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Vittorio BoscaroDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Claudia VanniniDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. claudia.vannini@unipi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6195-695X
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 565-FFABR 2017University of Pisa 565-60%2016University of Pisa 565-60%2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symbioses between prokaryotes and microbial eukaryotes, particularly ciliated protists, have been studied for a long time. Nevertheless, researchers have focused only on a few host genera and species, mainly due to difficulties in cultivating the hosts, and usually have considered a single symbiont at a time. Here, we present a pilot study using a single-cell microbiomic approach to circumvent these issues. Unicellular ciliate isolation followed by simultaneous amplification of eukaryotic and prokaryotic markers was used. Our preliminary test gave reliable and satisfactory results both on samples collected from different habitats (marine and freshwater) and on ciliates belonging to different taxonomic groups. Results suggest that, as already assessed for many macro-organisms like plants and metazoans, ciliated protists harbor distinct microbiomes. The applied approach detected new potential symbionts as well as new hosts for previously described ones, with relatively low time and cost effort and without culturing. When further developed, single-cell microbiomics for ciliates could be applied to a large number of studies aiming to unravel the evolutionary and ecological meaning of these symbiotic systems.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiological EvolutionCiliophoraEcosystemMetagenomicsPhylogenyPilot ProjectsSequence Analysis, DNASymbiosisBacterial symbiontsCiliatesMicrobiomicsMicrobiotaSSU rRNA geneSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID30411190
OpenAlexW2899626109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.