Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30411141›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

Minimal rest activity for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in a one-day stress-first protocol.

J D van Dijk, J A van Dalen, S Knollema, M Mouden, J P Ottervanger, P L Jager

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. OptimalJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  2. What is the optimal activity ratio for same-day myocardial perfusion SPECT?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J D van DijkDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Isala Hospital, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK, Zwolle, The Netherlands. jorisvdijk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7514-789X
J A van DalenDepartment of Medical Physics, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
S KnollemaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Isala Hospital, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
M MoudenDepartment of Cardiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
J P OttervangerDepartment of Cardiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
P L JagerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Isala Hospital, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGuidelines propose different rest-stress activity ratios (RSAR) for one-day stress-first SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), but evidence is limited. Our aim was to determine and validate the minimal RSAR resulting in the same diagnostic outcome in one-day stress-first SPECT MPI.

methodsForty-seven patients referred for rest after stress CZT-SPECT/CT MPI were prospectively included. Rest acquisitions were performed 3 h after stress. In addition to the stress and rest acquisitions, the first 22 patients underwent an additional acquisition prior to the rest injection to determine the remaining stress activity. Next, we simulated six RSARs varying from 1.0 to 3.5 in both patients and a phantom and compared the images to those using the reference RSAR of 4.0. Differences in summed difference score (SDS) >2 or ischemic defect interpretation were considered to significantly influence diagnostic outcome. After deriving the minimal RSAR, it was validated in 25 additional patients by comparing it to a RSAR of 4.0.

resultsAfter 3 h only 26% of the stress activity was still present in the myocardium. SDS differences >2 were found in one (4%) patient using RSAR of 3.5, 2.5 and 2.0, in three (12%) using 1.5 and in five (20%) using SRAR of 1.0. These results were consistent with the phantom study showing SDS differences >2 for RSARs ≤1.5 and with the visual interpretation which showed an increased number of deviating scans for RSAR 1.0. Validating the RSAR of 2.0 resulted in a different SDS in one patient (SDS of 30 versus 11). Moreover, two scans were interpreted as ischemic instead of normal when using RSAR 2.0 and in two other scans the opposite was the case.

conclusionsA RSAR of 2.0 in one-day stress-first MPI SPECT seems sufficient to obtain accurate diagnostic outcomes and is therefore recommended to reduce radiation exposure.

Indexed as

Myocardial Perfusion ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAgedAlgorithmsCadmiumExercise TestFemaleHeartHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumPhantoms, ImagingProspective StudiesRadionuclide ImagingCadmiumCdZnTeTelluriumZincActivityMyocardial perfusion imaging: SPECTOne-day protocolRadiation dose reductionStress-only

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.