Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30411088›Full record

Article... IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics2018

Activity and Circadian Rhythm of Sepsis Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.

Anis Davoudi, Duane B Corbett, Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Azra Bihorac, Scott C Brakenridge, Todd M Manini, Parisa Rashidi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ... IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Circadian regulation of pulmonary disease: the importance of timing.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anis DavoudiBiomedical Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
Duane B CorbettDepartment of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Tezcan Ozrazgat-BaslantiDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA.
Azra BihoracDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA.
Scott C BrakenridgeDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA.
Todd M ManiniDepartment of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Parisa RashidiBiomedical Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
University of Florida · US

Funding

University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTIAAN LEEUWENBURGH · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
PICS: A New Horizon for Surgical Critical CareP50GM111152 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MOORE, FREDERICK A · 2014 to 2018
$10.7M
Integrating data, algorithms and clinical reasoning for surgical risk assessmentR01GM110240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2016 to 2025
$5.1M
The acute development and persistence of frailty, comorbidity and disability in critically ill elderly patients after severe traumatic injury: ?induced frailty?R03AG056444 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BRAKENRIDGE, SCOTT CHARLES · 2017 to 2018
$223k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028740NIA NIH HHS R03 AG056444NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM111152NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early mobilization of critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) can prevent adverse outcomes such as delirium and post-discharge physical impairment. To date, no studies have characterized activity of sepsis patients in the ICU using granular actigraphy data. This study characterizes the activity of sepsis patients in the ICU to aid in future mobility interventions. We have compared the actigraphy features of 24 patients in four groups: Chronic Critical Illness (CCI) sepsis patients in the ICU, Rapid Recovery (RR) sepsis patients in the ICU, non-sepsis ICU patients (control-ICU), and healthy subjects. We used a total of 15 statistical and circadian rhythm features extracted from the patients' actigraphy data collected over a five-day period. Our results show that the four groups are significantly different in terms of activity features. In addition, we observed that the CCI and control-ICU patients show less regularity in their circadian rhythm compared to the RR patients. These results show the potential of using actigraphy data for guiding mobilization practices, classifying sepsis recovery subtype, as well as for tracking patients' recovery.

Identifiers

PMID30411088
PMCPMC6217819
OpenAlexW2778230531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.