ReviewACS omega2018
Analytical and Quantitative in Vivo Monitoring of Brain Neurochemistry by Electrochemical and Imaging Approaches.
Review in ACS omega, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbon microelectrodes for the measurement of neurotransmitters with fast-scan cyclic voltammetry: methodology and applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Non-Mass Spectrometric Targeted Single-Cell Metabolomics.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2023Article
- Accelerating the development of implantable neurochemical biosensors by using existing clinically applied depth electrodes.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Nano- and Microsensors for In Vivo Real-Time Electrochemical Analysis: Present and Future Perspectives.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Design and Evaluation of a Lactate Microbiosensor: Toward Multianalyte Monitoring of Neurometabolic Markers In Vivo in the Brain.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative monitoring of brain neurochemistry is aimed at an accurate measurement of chemical basal levels and dynamics defining neuronal activities. Analytical tools must be endowed with high selectivity, sensitivity, and spatiotemporal resolution to tackle this task. On one hand, in vivo electroanalysis combined with miniature electrodes has evolved into a minimally invasive method for probing transient events during neural communication and metabolism. On the other hand, noninvasive imaging techniques have been widely adopted in visualizing the neural structure and processes within a population of neurons in two or three dimensions. This perspective will give a concise review of the inspiring frontiers at the interface of neurochemistry and electrochemistry (microvoltammetry, nanoamperometry, galvanic redox potentiometry and ion transport-based sensing) or imaging (super-resolution single nanotube tracking, deep multiphoton microscopy, and free animal imaging). Potential opportunities with these methods and their combinations for multimodal brain analysis will be discussed, intending to draw a brief picture for future neuroscience research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.