Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30411000›Full record

ArticleNature sustainability2018

The role of local adaptation in sustainable village chicken production.

Judy M Bettridge, Androniki Psifidi, Zelalem G Terfa, Takele T Desta, Maria Lozano-Jaramillo, Tadelle Dessie, Pete Kaiser, Paul Wigley, Olivier Hanotte, Robert M Christley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature sustainability, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Judy M BettridgeInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, CH64 7TE, United Kingdom.
Androniki PsifidiThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Science, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Zelalem G TerfaInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, CH64 7TE, United Kingdom.
Takele T DestaLiveGene - CTLGH, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Maria Lozano-JaramilloWageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Tadelle DessieLiveGene - CTLGH, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Pete KaiserThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Science, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Paul WigleyInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, CH64 7TE, United Kingdom.
Olivier HanotteLiveGene - CTLGH, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Robert M ChristleyInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, CH64 7TE, United Kingdom.
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of London · GBWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H009051/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H009159/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H009396/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Village chickens are ubiquitous in smallholder farming systems, contributing to household, local and national economies under diverse environmental, economic and cultural settings. However, they are raised in challenging environments where productivity is low while mortality is high. There is much interest in utilizing indigenous genetic resources to produce a chicken resilient to its environment, whilst providing the basis of an economically sustainable enterprise. Globally, however, a wide variety of interventions have so far proved unable to deliver sustainable improvements. Here, we show that regional differences in trait preferences and parasite burden are associated with distinct chicken genepools, likely in response to interacting natural and human-driven (economic and social) selection pressures. Drivers of regional differences include marketing opportunities, cultural preferences, agro-ecologies and parasite populations, and are evident in system adaptations, such as management practices, population dynamics and bird genotypes. Our results provide sound multidisciplinary evidence to support previous observations that sustainable poultry development interventions for smallholder farmers, including breeding programs, should be locally tailored and designed for flexible implementation.

Indexed as

disease resistancegenomic variationlocal adaptationmanagement interventionphenotypic diversityvillage chickens

Identifiers

PMID30411000
PMCPMC6217978
OpenAlexW2897968122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.