ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2018
Elongated EABR wave latencies observed in patients with auditory neuropathy caused by
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Genetic Causes of Auditory Neuropathy: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- [Expert consensus on prognostic evaluation of cochlear implantation in hereditary hearing loss].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Flexible Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Platforms for Detecting Deafness Mutations in Koreans: A Proposed Guideline for the Etiologic Diagnosis of Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Patients WithFrontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
- Audiological Phenotype, Natural History, and Intervention in Chinese Patients With Auditory Neuropathy Caused by OTOF Variants.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe sought to determine how the pathology altered electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) in patients with hearing loss by evaluating EABRs in auditory neuropathy patients with
methodsWe included 15 patients with congenital hearing loss, grouped according to pathology:
resultsThe EABR latencies of Wave III and Wave V, and of the interval between them, were significantly longer in the
conclusionsOur results suggest LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Mainly a case report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.