Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30410959›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2018

Efficacy of duodenal bulb biopsy for diagnosis of celiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thomas R McCarty, Corey R O'Brien, Anas Gremida, Christina Ling, Tarun Rustagi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Refractory Celiac Disease: What the Gastroenterologist Should Know.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Role of endoscopy in the diagnosis of coeliac disease: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Celiac Disease Revisited.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Association between intestinal neoplasms and celiac disease: A review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Molecular Biomarkers for Celiac Disease: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Duodenal bulb biopsy in the diagnostic work-up of coeliac disease.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas R McCartyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
Corey R O'BrienDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
Anas GremidaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.
Christina LingDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.
Tarun RustagiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.
University of New Mexico · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID30410959
PMCPMC6221829
OpenAlexW2899837512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.