Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30410930›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2018

Safety of Natural Insecticides: Toxic Effects on Experimental Animals.

Abdel-Tawab H Mossa, Samia M M Mohafrash, Natarajan Chandrasekaran

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Larvicidal Potential ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdel-Tawab H MossaPesticide Chemistry Department, National Research Centre (NRC), 33 El Bohouth Street (Former El Tahrir St.), P.O. Box 12622, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-8112-8553
Samia M M MohafrashPesticide Chemistry Department, National Research Centre (NRC), 33 El Bohouth Street (Former El Tahrir St.), P.O. Box 12622, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-6295-4609
Natarajan ChandrasekaranCentre for Nanobiotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0586-134X
National Research Centre · EGVellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term application and extensive use of synthetic insecticides have resulted in accumulating their residues in food, milk, water, and soil and cause adverse health effects to human and ecosystems. Therefore, application of natural insecticides in agriculture and public health sectors has been increased as alternative to synthetic insecticides. The question here is, are all natural insecticides safe. Therefore, the review presented here focuses on the safety of natural insecticides. Natural insecticides contain chemical, mineral, and biological materials and some products are available commercially, e.g., pyrethrum, neem, spinosad, rotenone, abamectin,

Indexed as

Biological ProductsInsecticidesAnimalsToxicity TestsBiological ProductsInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID30410930
PMCPMC6206511
OpenAlexW2896007263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.