Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30410869›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in insect science2018

Insect and insect-inspired aerodynamics: unsteadiness, structural mechanics and flight control.

Richard J Bomphrey, Ramiro Godoy-Diana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in insect science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Highly deformable flapping membrane wings suppress the leading edge vortex in hover to perform better.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A simple model of wake capture aerodynamics.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Richard J BomphreyStructure and Motion Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Ramiro Godoy-DianaPhysique et Mécanique des Milieux Hétérogènes laboratory (PMMH), CNRS, ESPCI Paris - PSL Research University, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council R002657/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flying insects impress by their versatility and have been a recurrent source of inspiration for engineering devices. A large body of literature has focused on various aspects of insect flight, with an essential part dedicated to the dynamics of flapping wings and their intrinsically unsteady aerodynamic mechanisms. Insect wings flex during flight and a better understanding of structural mechanics and aeroelasticity is emerging. Most recently, insights from solid and fluid mechanics have been integrated with physiological measurements from visual and mechanosensors in the context of flight control in steady airs and through turbulent conditions. We review the key recent advances concerning flight in unsteady environments and how the multi-body mechanics of the insect structure-wings and body-are at the core of the flight control question. The issues herein should be considered when applying bio-informed design principles to robotic flapping wings.

Indexed as

Flight, AnimalInsectaWings, AnimalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaMicrotechnologyModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID30410869
PMCPMC6218012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.