ArticleCureus2018
Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy and its Association with Cardiovascular and All-cause Mortality in Patients with End-stage Renal Disease.
Article in Cureus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autonomic neuropathy in dialysis patients - investigations with a new symptom score (COMPASS 31).BMC nephrology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of Bellavere's score in cardiac autonomic neuropathy among chronic kidney disease patients: a study of prevalence and dialysis impact.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Recurrence Quantitative Analysis of Wavelet-Based Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Testing in Heart Rate Variability.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background End-stage renal disease frequently leads to increased cardiovascular mortality. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) may be predictive of cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in patients with end-stage renal disease. Methods A total of 70 patients with end-stage renal disease were included in the study. The assessment of cardiac dysautonomia was based on the four standardized tests performed at the baseline and, again, at the end of the study. The criteria for CAN included at least two abnormal test results. Results Fifty of 70 patients completed the study and were followed-up after one year. Out of the 50 patients, 44 (88%) had CAN at baseline. Twelve (24%) patients died at the one-year follow-up. Sudden cardiac death was reported in seven out of 12 (58%) patients. All seven patients who died had high dysautonomia scores (three abnormal tests) at the baseline. There was a significantly higher percentage of patients with all four abnormal tests amongst patients who died of any cause (56% vs. 17%; RR 6.07, 95% CI 1.29-28.49; p-value 0.02) or due to sudden cardiac death (43% vs. 10.5%; RR 6.37, 95% CI 1.03-39.36; p-value 0.04). All five patients who did not have CAN at the baseline developed this abnormality on repeat testing after one year. Conclusion The prevalence of CAN in patients with end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis was significantly higher. CAN was an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, which highlights it as a risk stratification tool in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.