Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30410762›Full record

ReviewEvolution, medicine, and public health2018

The influenza of 1918: Evolutionary perspectives in a historical context.

Margaret Humphreys

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Plants with antiviral properties used in Otorhinolaryngology.Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Clinical data to be used as a foundation to combat Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy.Journal of interprofessional education & practice · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Onward transmission of viruses: how do viruses emerge to cause epidemics after spillover?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  9. Race and 1918 Influenza Pandemic in the United States: A Review of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Margaret HumphreysDepartment of History, Duke University, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-0907-3516

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 1918 influenza pandemic was the deadliest in known human history. It spread globally to the most isolated of human communities, causing clinical disease in a third of the world's population, and infecting nearly every human alive at the time. Determination of mortality numbers is complicated by weak contemporary surveillance in the developing world, but recent estimates put the death toll at 50 million or even higher. This outbreak is of great interest to modern day epidemiologists, virologists, global health researchers and evolutionary biologists. They ask: Where did it come from? And if it happened once, could it happen again? Understanding how such a virulent epidemic emerged and spread offers hope for prevention and strategies of response. This review uses historical methodology and evolutionary perspectives to revisit the 1918 outbreak. Using the American military experience as a case study, it investigates the emergence of virulence in 1918 by focusing on key susceptibility factors that favored both the influenza virus and the subsequent pneumococcal invasion that took so many lives. This article explores the history of the epidemic and contemporary measures against it, surveys modern research on the virus, and considers what aspects of 1918 human and animal ecology most contributed to the emergence of this pandemic.

Indexed as

influenzasocial determinants of healthvirulenceWorld War 1

Identifiers

PMID30410762
PMCPMC6218637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.