ArticleOman medical journal2018
Patterns and Complications of Ingested Foreign Bodies in Omani Children.
Article in Oman medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple Magnet Ingestion in a Child With an Overlooked Diagnosis Leading to Intestinal Perforation.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Pediatric foreign body ingestion in Makkah, Saudi Arabia: A retrospective epidemiological study.Saudi medical journal · 2023Article
- Indications and Yield of Pediatric Endoscopy in Bahrain: A Tertiary Center Experience.International journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- [Consultations for digestive foreign bodies ingestion in a pediatric emergency department.]Revista espanola de salud publica · 2020Observational
- Urgent endoscopy in children: epidemiology in a large region of France.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Endoscopic management of foreign body ingestion in children.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2020Article
- Foreign Body Ingestion in Children: The Role of X-ray.Oman medical journal · 2019Article
- Foreign object ingestion and esophageal food impaction: An update and review on endoscopic management.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe sought to describe the frequency of encounters and complications of foreign body (FB) ingestion in children seen at Royal Hospital, Oman.
methodsMedical records of all children (≤ 13 years) who presented to Royal Hospital between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2014 diagnosed with FB ingestion were reviewed. Children with FBs in their mouth or airway, with esophageal food impaction, and caustic ingestion were excluded from the analysis. Parameters including age, sex, type of FB, anatomical location of the FB on X-ray, endoscopic findings, and all complications were reviewed.
resultsOf the 585 children diagnosed with FB ingestion, 385 were included in the study; 58.4% were males and 41.6% were females giving a male to female ratio of 1.4:1.0. Half (50.9%) of the children were less than three years old. Coins were the most frequently ingested objects (41.3%) followed by disc batteries (12.2%). Sixty-three patients (16.3%) required urgent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). EGD was performed mainly for coins (44.4%) followed by disc batteries (14.3%) in the esophagus or stomach. The complication rate was 5.2% in total, and 3.6% for clinically significant complications. We had no mortality cases.
conclusionsFB ingestion is common in toddlers in Oman. Coins and disc batteries are most commonly ingested calling for strict family vigilance. Endoscopy is done in a small number of children and clinically significant complications, in general, are low. However, these findings should not lead to a false sense of security, and ingested FBs should always be taken seriously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.