Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30410648›Full record

ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal

Use of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Central Venous Disease.

Justinas Silickas, Stephen A Black, Alkystis Phinikaridou, Adam M Gwozdz, Alberto Smith, Prakash Saha

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Usefulness of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging prior to venous interventions.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2019
    Article
  7. Emerging Insights of Management of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Justinas SilickasSCHOOL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE AND SCIENCES, KING'S COLLEGE LONDON, LONDON, UK.
Stephen A BlackSCHOOL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE AND SCIENCES, KING'S COLLEGE LONDON, LONDON, UK.
Alkystis PhinikaridouSCHOOL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE AND SCIENCES, KING'S COLLEGE LONDON, LONDON, UK.
Adam M GwozdzSCHOOL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE AND SCIENCES, KING'S COLLEGE LONDON, LONDON, UK.
Alberto SmithSCHOOL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE AND SCIENCES, KING'S COLLEGE LONDON, LONDON, UK.
Prakash SahaSCHOOL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE AND SCIENCES, KING'S COLLEGE LONDON, LONDON, UK.
King's College London · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/15/89/31793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful management of acute deep vein thrombosis and post-thrombotic syndrome depends on careful patient selection and detailed investigation of thrombus extent, composition, and anatomy. This article reviews the use of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of central deep veins of the pelvis and addresses new developments within the field. Despite drawbacks of each imaging modality, when contemplating deep venous reconstruction, cross-sectional imaging should be considered for preoperative planning and to compliment intraoperative imaging tools, including intravascular ultrasound and contrast venography.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyMagnetic Resonance AngiographyHumansPhlebographyPostthrombotic SyndromePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisVeinsVenous Thrombosiscomputerized tomography venographyCTVdeep vein thrombosisDVTmagnetic resonance venographyMRV

Identifiers

PMID30410648
PMCPMC6217557
OpenAlexW2942904736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.