Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30410580›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2018

Transition-transversion encoding and genetic relationship metric in ReliefF feature selection improves pathway enrichment in GWAS.

M Arabnejad, B A Dawkins, W S Bush, B C White, A R Harkness, B A McKinney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Brief Survey on Machine Learning in Epistasis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M Arabnejad1Tandy School of Computer Science, The University of Tulsa, 800 S. Tucker Dr, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA.
B A Dawkins2Department of Mathematics, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA.
W S Bush3Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, 2103 Cornell Road, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA.
B C White1Tandy School of Computer Science, The University of Tulsa, 800 S. Tucker Dr, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA.
A R Harkness4Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA.
B A McKinney1Tandy School of Computer Science, The University of Tulsa, 800 S. Tucker Dr, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9494-8833
University of Tulsa · USCornell University · US

Funding

The Center for Neuroscience-based Mental Health Assessment and Prediction (NEUROMAP)P20GM121312 · NIGMS · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI Adrienne A Taren · 2017 to 2026
$23.7M
Molecular Mechanisms and Genetics of AutoimmunityP20GM103456 · NIGMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI GAFFNEY, PATRICK M · 2012 to 2013
$4.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103456NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReliefF is a nearest-neighbor based feature selection algorithm that efficiently detects variants that are important due to statistical interactions or epistasis. For categorical predictors, like genotypes, the standard metric used in ReliefF has been a simple (binary) mismatch difference. In this study, we develop new metrics of varying complexity that incorporate allele sharing, adjustment for allele frequency heterogeneity via the genetic relationship matrix (GRM), and physicochemical differences of variants via a new transition/transversion encoding.

methodsWe introduce a new two-dimensional transition/transversion genotype encoding for ReliefF, and we implement three ReliefF attribute metrics: 1.) genotype mismatch (GM), which is the ReliefF standard, 2.) allele mismatch (AM), which accounts for heterozygous differences and has not been used previously in ReliefF, and 3.) the new transition/transversion metric. We incorporate these attribute metrics into the ReliefF nearest neighbor calculation with a Manhattan metric, and we introduce GRM as a new ReliefF nearest-neighbor metric to adjust for allele frequency heterogeneity.

resultsWe apply ReliefF with each metric to a GWAS of major depressive disorder and compare the detection of genes in pathways implicated in depression, including Axon Guidance, Neuronal System, and G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling. We also compare with detection by Random Forest and Lasso as well as random/null selection to assess pathway size bias.

conclusionsOur results suggest that using more genetically motivated encodings, such as transition/transversion, and metrics that adjust for allele frequency heterogeneity, such as GRM, lead to ReliefF attribute scores with improved pathway enrichment.

Indexed as

Feature selectionGenetic relationship matrix (GRM)Genome-wide association study (GWAS)Machine learningTransition and transversion

Identifiers

PMID30410580
PMCPMC6215626
OpenAlexW2898856197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.